1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nezavi [6.7K]
3 years ago
10

What best describes the relationship between the frequency of an oscillation and the period of the oscillation?

Physics
1 answer:
ZanzabumX [31]3 years ago
4 0

Explanation:

Let f is the frequency of an oscillation and T is the period of the oscillation. There exists an inverse relationship between the frequency and the time period of the oscillation. Mathematically, it is given by :

f=\dfrac{1}{T}

Also, f=\dfrac{\omega}{2\pi}

So,

T=\dfrac{2\pi}{\omega}

The time taken to complete one oscillation is called the period of the oscillation and the number of oscillation is called the frequency if an oscillation.

You might be interested in
As an object moves, the distance it travels increases with time.<br><br> Agree<br> Disagree
Mnenie [13.5K]
Agree

Hope this helps
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A test car starts from rest on a horizontal circular track of 115-m radius and increases its speed at a uniform rate to reach 90
Wewaii [24]

Answer:

a= 3.49 m/s^2

Explanation:

magnitude of total acceleration = sqrt{radial acceleration^2+tangential acceleration^2}.

we know that tangential acceleration a_t= change in velocity /time taken

now 90 km/h = 25 m/s

a_t = 25/17 = 1.47 m/s^2.

radial acceleration a_r = v^2/r

v= a_t×t = 1.47×13 = 19.11 m/s

a_r = 19.11^2/115=  3.175

now,

a= \sqrt{a_t^2+a_r^2}

a= \sqrt{1.47^2+3.175^2}

a= 3.49 m/s^2

3 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
QUESTION 1
Sveta_85 [38]

distance from the Sun of 2.77 astronomical units or about 414 million km 257 million miles and orbiting period of 4.62 years

7 0
3 years ago
A crate is sliding on the floor. If there is a total force acting on the crate in the same direction as it is sliding, the crate
Leto [7]

But we do not know whether the force is pushing or pulling (the same direction (both forces are parallel) but: .........[ ]<-F-- or .......[ ]--F-->). I suppose the correct answer is B

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Suppose you are planning a trip in which a spacecraft is to travel at a constant velocity for exactly six months, as measured by
    5·1 answer
  • Calculate the wavelengths of the first five members of the Lyman series of spectral lines, providing the result in units Angstro
    6·1 answer
  • The study of the Earth's magnetic field is known as
    5·1 answer
  • Clouds dump around 100 billion gallons of water on rainforests each year. How much rain is evaporated from the rivers, lakes and
    9·2 answers
  • What is empirical evidence and what's is it not
    7·1 answer
  • Mickey walks Pluto 4 miles North to the dog park. Mickey finds beautiful
    10·1 answer
  • @kikatkraken This is the energy of an object while it is in motion.
    9·1 answer
  • An unusual lightning strike has a vertical portion with a current of –400 A downwards. The Earth’s magnetic field at that locati
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the energy changes involved when a positive charge moves because of a nearby, negatively charged object. use the terms e
    14·2 answers
  • AYUDAAAAAAA Un ciclista de montaña se mueve cuesta abajo por la pendiente, si acelera a 3 m/s2 y se demora en bajar 15 minutos (
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!