Answer:
the claim is not valid or reasonable.
Explanation:
In order to test the claim we will find the maximum and actual efficiencies. maximum efficiency of a heat engine can be found as:
η(max) = 1 - T₁/T₂
where,
η(max) = maximum efficiency = ?
T₁ = Sink Temperature = 300 K
T₂ = Source Temperature = 400 K
Therefore,
η(max) = 1 - 300 K/400 K
η(max) = 0.25 = 25%
Now, we calculate the actual frequency of the engine:
η = W/Q
where,
W = Net Work = 250 KJ
Q = Heat Received = 750 KJ
Therefore,
η = 250 KJ/750 KJ
η = 0.333 = 33.3 %
η > η(max)
The actual efficiency of a heat engine can never be greater than its Carnot efficiency or the maximum efficiency.
<u>Therefore, the claim is not valid or reasonable.</u>
All metals except potassium and sodium, have a property known as malleability. Malleability is the quality of something that can be shaped into something else without breaking. So when aluminium and copper are hammered they will not break. Rather they will change shape and become thin or flat at the area where its hammered.
All Non- metals except diamond are brittle in nature, so when we hammer it , they will break down into pieces. So when ice and glass will be hammered they will shatter into pieces.
D. compost bins because they recycle matter into a new form
Explanation:
- The law of conservation of matter is about the creation and how matter is being transferred. According to the law, the matter cannot be destroyed. The matter should always be transferred from one form to another in the universe. There is never destruction of matter happens. There is also one more point to it, as it cannot be destroyed it also cannot be created.
- Here in the options, option A tells us the creation which is not possible, option B says about the destruction of matter which is not true according to the law, C is about storing the matter which will not happen because its get transferred and D is the correct option because it talks about the recycle/ transfer of matter.
About half of the people mostly MEN..?
