Answer:
c) .51835
Explanation:
Let the relative abundance of the lighter of the two isotopes be X we have
Then the relative abundance of the heavier isotope is then (1-X)
Whereby we have that in nature the amount of the lighter silver found in proportion is X and the heavier isotope of silver is present as (1-X) proportion in nature.
To calculate the relative atomic mass of silver, we have
(Mass of light weight silver)×X + (mass of heavier isotope of silver×(1-X) = relative atomic mass of silver
106.90509(X) + 108.9047(1-X)
108.9-108.9(x)+106.9(x) = 107.87
-2x-1.03 = 0.517450902926
Closest answer is c
c) .5184
The relative atomic mass of isotopes is the weighted average by the mole-fraction of abundance of these isotopes which gives the atomic weight that is listed for that element on the periodic table.
Answer:
It's too far away
Explanation:
According to classical mechanics, gravitational pull is inversely proportional to the distance squared; as the distance increases, the gravitational pull decreases at a faster and faster rate. Since Alpha Centauri A is a few lightyears (Tens of trillions of kilometers away), without even needing to calculate the force of gravity, it is very miniscule.
0.06105 moles is the number of moles of water lost.
<h3>What is molar mass?</h3>
Molar mass is defined as the mass in grams of one mole of a substance.
Given data:
Mass of water = 1.1g
Molar mass water = 18.016 g/mol
Moles of water =?
These quantities are related by the following equation;
Moles = 
Substituting the values of the quantities and solving for moles, we have;
Moles = 
= 0.06105 moles.
Hence, the 0.06105 moles is the number of moles of water lost.
Learn more about molar mass here:
brainly.com/question/12127540
#SPJ1
A whole number, not a fraction, that can be negative, positive or zero are integers. They cannot have decimal places.
Now, converting 0.000431 L to decimal an integer as:
Since, 
So, 
.
Hence, the integer value for 0.000431 L is 
.
