Answer:
-True - True - true - false -false - false
Explanation:
- True The flow depends only on the charge into the surface, not on the relative position
- True The two vectors are radial, so their relative direction do not changes
- True It just depends on the charge inside
- False, it only depends on the charge, not on the form from the integration surface
- False, because if it has a load inside it can be considered in the center, but if the load is outside the flow lines change direction with respect to the surface
- False The flow depends only on the load inside, not on its position
Answer:
Explanation:subtract all of those by the all of the other numbers and that’s the answer i think that’s the way I learned it
i'm stuck on that question also
I would say 648858. bc yes
Answer:
No, it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder model when finding the temperatures near the bottom or top surfaces of a cylinder.
Explanation:
A cylinder is said to be infinitely long when is of a sufficient length. Also, when the diameter of the cylinder is relatively small compared to the length, it is called infinitely long cylinder.
Cylindrical rods can also be treated as infinitely long when dealing with heat transfers at locations far from the top or bottom surfaces. However, it not proper to treat the cylinder as being infinitely long when:
* When the diameter and length are comparable (i.e have the same measurement)
When finding the temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder, it is NOT PROPER TO USE AN INFINITELY LONG CYLINDER because heat transfer at those locations can be two-dimensional.
Therefore, the answer to the question is NO, since it is not proper to use an infinitely long cylinder when finding temperatures near the bottom or top of a cylinder.
