1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
2 years ago
12

The objective lens of a microscope has a focal length of 5.5mm. Part A What eyepiece focal length will give the microscope an ov

erall angular magnification of 300
Physics
1 answer:
son4ous [18]2 years ago
5 0

Complete Question

The distance between the objective and eyepiece lenses in a microscope is 19 cm . The objective lens has a focal length of 5.5 mm .

What eyepiece focal length will give the microscope an overall angular magnification of 300?

Answer:

The  eyepiece focal length is  f_e  = 0.027 \ m

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The focal length is  f_o =  5.5 \ mm =  -0.0055 \ m

This negative sign shows the the microscope is diverging light

     The  angular magnification is m = 300

     The  distance between the objective and the eyepieces lenses is  Z =  19 \ cm  = 0.19 \ m

Generally the magnification is mathematically represented as

        m  =  [\frac{Z - f_e }{f_e}] [\frac{0.25}{f_0} ]

Where f_e is the eyepiece focal length of the microscope

  Now  making f_e the subject  of the formula

         f_e  = \frac{Z}{1 - [\frac{M  *  f_o }{0.25}] }

substituting values

        f_e  = \frac{ 0.19 }{1 - [\frac{300  *  -0.0055 }{0.25}] }

         f_e  = 0.027 \ m

     

You might be interested in
It takes 23 hours 56 minutes and 4 seconds for the earth to make one revolution (mean sidereal day). What is the angular speed o
Dominik [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Check attachment for solution

3 0
3 years ago
Can someone plz help me with this
Elena-2011 [213]
1st Law: Objects that are in motion tend to stay in motion. This motion can change with external forces. 

<span>If you were to stop pedaling on bike while in motion, you will notice that you will keep moving. This is because a moving body (you) has inertia. If there wasn't any friction between the tires and the ground, between the axles and wheel, any air resistance, or any other force that acts against you, then you could be coasting indefinitely! </span>

<span>2nd Law: Force is equal to the mass times acceleration. </span>

<span>When you pedal, you are applying a force onto the pedal. This force is then translated through tension to apply torque onto the wheel. Turning the wheel will make you accelerate in the lateral direction. </span>

<span>3rd Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. </span>

<span>Without this, you could pedal and pedal, but you will be not go anywhere! It is essentially the friction between the tires and the ground that propels you forward. If the ground did not apply to the tire the same amount of force that the tire was applying to the ground, the tire would not "catch" and no friction would be applied. And if there was no third law, the weight of you and your bike would "sink" into the ground because the ground would not be applying a normal force back onto you.

hope this helps and if you have any questions just hmu and ask :)</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What is the momentum of a 1200 kg car traveling with a speed of 27 m/s (60 mph)?
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

This is your answer

Explanation:

Actually I took this from go ogle

3 0
2 years ago
How do you make a magnet with wire and electricity ?
AVprozaik [17]
<h2>Answer:</h2>

<u>By wrapping the wire along a solenoid and connecting it to electricity</u>

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

If you wrap a copper wire into coils and run an electrical current through it, you will create a magnetic field. If you rotate a permanent magnet as opposed to an item that has been magnetized inside a coil of copper wire, you can create an electrical current. The strength of magnetic field generated is proportional to the amount of current through the winding.

5 0
3 years ago
Why do nuclear power plants use fission rather than fusion to generate
kicyunya [14]

B. Fusion requires very high pressure and temperature.

Explanation:

Nuclear fusion is the combination of atomic nuclei into larger ones with the release of a large amount of energy.

Nuclear fission is the decay process in which a heavy nuclide is bombarded with with neutrons.

  • Both processes release a huge amount of energy.
  • But fusion produces far more energy.
  • The reason why nuclear fusion is not in use is because of the high pressure and temperature needed start it.
  • The activation energy is high and the energy barrier is very great.
  • Only the core of the sun naturally favors fusion

learn more:

transmutation brainly.com/question/3433940

#learnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ,how do charged objects react???quiet urgent
    11·2 answers
  • A car travels 2155.0m in 195.9s. What is the car's average speed?
    9·1 answer
  • A single-turn current loop carrying a 4.00 A current, is in the shape of a right-angle triangle with sides of 50.0 cm, 120 cm, a
    15·1 answer
  • LOL SOMEONE DO THIS FOR ME!!!
    11·1 answer
  • PLS HELP I HAVE EXAM ILL GIVE U BRAINLIST
    7·1 answer
  • A block is pulled across a table by a constant force of 9.20 N. If the mass of the block is 2.30kg, how fast will the block be m
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about the mass of an object?
    13·1 answer
  • Calculate the reading on voltmeter v²​
    7·2 answers
  • What ocean resource may be harvested by vacuuming or trawling?
    8·2 answers
  • Two objects perform the same task. One has thousands of moving parts while the other has no moving parts. What are they?.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!