Answer:

Explanation:
the half life of the given circuit is given by

where [/tex]\tau = RC[/tex]

Given 
resistance in the circuit is 40 ohm and to extend the half cycle we added new resister of 48 ohm. the net resitance is 40+48 = 88 ohms
now the new half life is

Divide equation 2 by 1


putting all value we get new half life


Answer:
a)W=12.62 kJ/mol
b)W=12.59 kJ/mol
Explanation:
At T = 100 °C the second and third virial coefficients are
B = -242.5 cm^3 mol^-1
C = 25200 cm^6 mo1^-2
Now according isothermal work of one mole methyl gas is
W=-
a=
b=
from virial equation

And

a=
b=
Now calculate V1 and V2 at given condition

Substitute given values
= 1 x 10^5 , T = 373.15 and given values of coefficients we get

Solve for V1 by iterative or alternative cubic equation solver we get

Similarly solve for state 2 at P2 = 50 bar we get

Now

a=241.33
b=30780
After performing integration we get work done on the system is
W=12.62 kJ/mol
(b) for Z = 1 + B' P +C' P^2 = PV/RT by performing differential we get
dV=RT(-1/p^2+0+C')dP
Hence work done on the system is

a=
b=
by substituting given limit and P = 1 bar , P2 = 50 bar and T = 373 K we get work
W=12.59 kJ/mol
The work by differ between a and b because the conversion of constant of virial coefficients are valid only for infinite series
Answer:
The tube surface temperature immediately after installation is 120.4°C and after prolonged service is 110.8°C
Explanation:
The properties of water at 100°C and 1 atm are:
pL = 957.9 kg/m³
pV = 0.596 kg/m³
ΔHL = 2257 kJ/kg
CpL = 4.217 kJ/kg K
uL = 279x10⁻⁶Ns/m²
KL = 0.68 W/m K
σ = 58.9x10³N/m
When the water boils on the surface its heat flux is:

For copper-water, the properties are:
Cfg = 0.0128
The heat flux is:
qn = 0.9 * 18703.42 = 16833.078 W/m²

The tube surface temperature immediately after installation is:
Tinst = 100 + 20.4 = 120.4°C
For rough surfaces, Cfg = 0.0068. Using the same equation:
ΔT = 10.8°C
The tube surface temperature after prolonged service is:
Tprolo = 100 + 10.8 = 110.8°C
Explanation:!!
I hope you Feel better :)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
If the Ajax representative fails to correct the previous statement this can cause misrepresentation.