Answer:
a) 1.3 rad/s
b) 0.722 s
Explanation:
Given
Initial velocity, ω = 0 rad/s
Angular acceleration of the wheel, α = 1.8 rad/s²
using equations of angular motion, we have
θ2 - θ1 = ω(0)[t2 - t1] + 1/2α(t2 - t1)²
where
θ2 - θ1 = 53.2 rad
t2 - t1 = 7s
substituting these in the equation, we have
θ2 - θ1 = ω(0)[t2 - t1] + 1/2α(t2 - t1)²
53.2 =ω(0) * 7 + 1/2 * 1.8 * 7²
53.2 = 7.ω(0) + 1/2 * 1.8 * 49
53.2 = 7.ω(0) + 44.1
7.ω(0) = 53.2 - 44.1
ω(0) = 9.1 / 7
ω(0) = 1.3 rad/s
Using another of the equations of angular motion, we have
ω(0) = ω(i) + α*t1
1.3 = 0 + 1.8 * t1
1.3 = 1.8 * t1
t1 = 1.3/1.8
t1 = 0.722 s
2.72 N
Explanation:
Step 1:
From the basic formula in electrostatics
F = E * q
where F = Force due to charges
E = Electric field strength
q = Charge
Step 2:
From the given question
q= 
E = 
F =
N
From Carnot's theorem, for any engine working between these two temperatures:
efficiency <= (1-tc/th) * 100
Given: tc = 300k (from question assuming it is not 5300 as it seems)
For a, th = 900k, efficiency = (1-300/900) = 70%
For b, th = 500k, efficiency = (1-300/500) = 40%
For c, th = 375k, efficiency = (1-300/375) = 20%
Hence in case of a and b, efficiency claimed is lesser than efficiency calculated, which is valid case and in case of c, however efficiency claimed is greater which is invalid.