1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sdas [7]
3 years ago
14

Ray run 30 N. 30 feet with in 30 feet so what is the distance

Physics
1 answer:
Mrrafil [7]3 years ago
4 0
Ray is fat ...........
You might be interested in
Given the necessary information about the two components of projectile motion, your task is to explain the difference or even de
ivann1987 [24]

The two components of projectile motion include the following:

  • Horizontal motion
  • Vertical motion.

<h3>What is a Projectile?</h3>

This is defined as a missile propelled by the application of an external force and allowed to move freely under the influence of gravity and air resistance.

The equation for Horizontal motion Vx = V * cos(α)

Vertical velocity component: Vy = V * sin(α)

Read more about Projectile here brainly.com/question/24216590

8 0
2 years ago
If a nearsighted person has a far point df that is 3.50 m from the eye, what is the focal length f1 of the contact lenses that t
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

f1 = -3.50 m

Explanation:

For a nearsighted person an object at infinity must be made to  appear  to be at his far point which is 3.50 m away. The image of an object at infinity must be formed on the same side of the lens as the object.

∴ v = -3.5 m

Using mirror formula,

i/f1 = 1/v + 1/u

Where f1 = focal length of the contact lens, v = image distance = -3.5 m, u =         object distance = at infinity(∞) = 1/0

∴ 1/f1 = (1/-3.5) + 1/infinity

  Note that, 1/infinity = 1/(1/0) = 0/1 =0.

∴ 1/f1 = 1/(-3.5) + 0

  1/f1 = 1/(-3.5)

Solving the equation by finding the inverse of both side of the equation.

∴ f1 = -3.50 m

 Therefore a converging lens of focal length  f1 = -3.50 m

would be needed by the person to see an object at infinity clearly

8 0
3 years ago
Two parallel plate capacitors 1 and 2 are identical except that capacitor 1 has charge +q on one plate and charge −q on the othe
Grace [21]

Answer:

a) the capacitance is the same for both capacitors.

b) The potential difference between the plates for the capacitor with charge +2q, is double of the one for the capacitor  with charge +q.

c) The electric field magnitude between the plates for the capacitor with charge +2q, is double of the one for the capacitor with charge +q

d) The energy stored between the plates for the capacitor with charge +2q, is 4 times the value for the one with charge +q  

Explanation:

a) The capacitance of a capacitor, by definition, is as follows:

C = \frac{q}{V}

Appying Gauss' Law to one of plates, it can be showed, that the capacitance (for a parallel plates capacitor) can be  expressed as follows:

C = ε*A / d

As it can be seen, it does not depend on the charge. so we conclude that the capacitance must be the same for both capacitors, due to they are identical except for the value of the charge on the plates.

b) By definition, as we said above, the capacitance is equal to the proportion between the charge of one of the plates, and the potential difference between them.

If this proportion must remain the same, and one of the capacitors has the double of  the charge than the other, the potential difference must be the double also.

c) Applying Gauss' law, to the surface of one of  the plates, and assuming a constant surface charge density σ, it can be  showed that the  electric field can be calculated as follows:

E*A = Q/ε₀ as σ=Q/A

⇒ E = σ/ε₀

As σ is directly proportional to the charge (being the area A the same), we conclude that the electric field for the capacitor with charge +2q must be the double than the one for the capacitior with charge +q.

c) The electric potential energy, stored between plates of a capacitor, can be written as follows:

Ue = \frac{1}{2} *\frac{q^{2}}{C}

If the capacitance remains the same, we can conclude that the electric potential energy for the capacitor with charge +2q, as the charge is raised to the 2nd power, must be 4 times the one for the capacitor with charge +q.

4 0
3 years ago
If you have observed something about the world and want to
ExtremeBDS [4]

Answer: a

Explanation: :)

5 0
2 years ago
Find the electric potential VP at point P. [Hint: To input a natural logarithm into the answer box, simply type the letters "ln"
Alik [6]

Answer:

After finding the electric potential VP at point P = Q/Чπϵ₀L ㏑(1+\frac{L}{d})

Explanation:

I believe it is a part C question.  

The derivative of V and P  will be directly proportional to the differential dq and the inverse of Чπϵ₀δ........

Please find detailed solution in the attached picture as i believe that is the answer to the part C question you are seeking for.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A rubber block weighing 60. newtons is resting on a horizontal surface of dry asphalt. what is magnitude of the minimum force ne
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following graphs represents constant positive acceleration
    10·1 answer
  • What is the mechanical advantage of the level shown below?
    10·1 answer
  • Coherent light of wavelength 540 nm passes through a pair of thin slits that are 3.4 × 10-5 m apart. At what angle away from the
    9·1 answer
  • Can anyone give me the description of the element mercury is positioned on the periodic table of elements and a list of other el
    15·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me with this
    7·1 answer
  • A large box slides across a frictionless surface with a velocity of 12 m/s and a mass of 4
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true regarding the speed of earthquake waves?
    5·1 answer
  • Grant sprints 50m to the right with an average velocity of 3.0 m/s
    5·1 answer
  • ¿Qué cantidad de calor absorbió una masa de 4 g de cinc al pasar de 20 °C a<br> 180 °C?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!