This is false because it doesn't matter about the mass
Destroying the wetlands will reduce the bay's water quality and vegetation will not grow effectively near bay as a result of which ecosystem will also destroy.
<h3>What is ecosystem?</h3>
All species and the physical environment with which they interact make up an ecosystem.
- Nutrient cycles and energy flows bind these biotic and abiotic components together.
- Photosynthesis brings energy into the system, which is absorbed into plant tissue.
As it is already mentioned that, water of the wetlands was carry nutrients which in turn was taken up by plants and vegetation, and if it will destroyed near a bay then the vegetation of that place will destroy as they will not get proper nutrients, which in turn also affects the ecosystem.
Hence destroying the wetlands will reduce the bay's water quality and vegetation will not grow effectively near bay as a result of which ecosystem will also destroy.
To know more about ecosystem, visit the below link:
brainly.com/question/2189549
#SPJ1
Plants :)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
(slow)xy2+z→xy2z (fast) c step1:step2:xy2+z2→xy2z2
Explanation:
Step1: xy2+z2→xy2z2 (slow)
Step2: xy2z2→xy2z+z (fast)
2XY 2 + Z 2 → 2XY 2 Z
Rate= k[xy2][z2]
When the two elementary steps are summed up, the result is equivalent to the stoichiometric equation. Hence, this mechanism is acceptable. The order of both elementary steps is 2, which is ‘≤3’; this also makes this mechanism acceptable. Furthermore, the rate equation aligns with the experimentally determined rate equation, and this also makes this mechanism acceptable. Therefore, since all the three rules have been observed, this mechanism is possible.
Force is a strength or energy as an attribute or physical action or movement, motion is the action or process of moving or being moved
