Answer:
Temperature is the kinetic energy of the particles of a substance.
Explanation:
The more kinetic energy a particle has the higher it's temperature. In the case of the atmosphere, which is what we are primarily concerned with in Meteorology, we measure this using a mercury thermometer (in certain situations we use an alcohol thermometer and of course modern times have given us things like dewcells and digital thermometers but we always go back to the mercury thermometer for accuracy).
The force on the tool is entirely in the negative-y direction.
So no work is done during any moves in the x-direction.
The work will be completely defined by
(Force) x (distance in the y-direction),
and it won't matter what route the tool follows to get anywhere.
Only the initial and final y-coordinates matter.
We know that F = - 2.85 y². (I have no idea what that ' j ' is doing there.)
Remember that 'F' is pointing down.
From y=0 to y=2.40 is a distance of 2.40 upward.
Sadly, since the force is not linear over the distance, I don't think
we can use the usual formula for Work = (force) x (distance).
I think instead we'll need to integrate the force over the distance,
and I can't wait to see whether I still know how to do that.
Work = integral of (F·dy) evaluated from 0 to 2.40
= integral of (-2.85 y² dy) evaluated from 0 to 2.40
= (-2.85) · integral of (y² dy) evaluated from 0 to 2.40 .
Now, integral of (y² dy) = 1/3 y³ .
Evaluated from 0 to 2.40 , it's (1/3 · 2.40³) - (1/3 · 0³)
= 1/3 · 13.824 = 4.608 .
And the work = (-2.85) · the integral
= (-2.85) · (4.608)
= - 13.133 .
-- There are no units in the question (except for that mysterious ' j ' after the 'F',
which totally doesn't make any sense at all).
If the ' F ' is newtons and the 2.40 is meters, then the -13.133 is joules.
-- The work done by the force is negative, because the force points
DOWN but we lifted the tool UP to 2.40. Somebody had to provide
13.133 of positive work to lift the tool up against the force, and the force
itself did 13.133 of negative work to 'allow' the tool to move up.
-- It doesn't matter whether the tool goes there along the line x=y , or
by some other route. WHATEVER the route is, the work done by ' F '
is going to total up to be -13.133 joules at the end of the day.
As I hinted earlier, the last time I actually studied integration was in 1972,
and I haven't really used it too much since then. But that's my answer
and I'm stickin to it. If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, and I hope somebody
will show me where I'm wrong.
Answer:
The correct option is C
Explanation:
According to third equation of motion, v
2
=u
2
+2ax
Here, u=0 m/s
a=−g and x=−h
Negative sign indicates downward direction. Displacement and acceleration both are downwards.
So,v=±
2(−g)(−h)
We take minus sign because it is downwards.
v=−
2gh
After bouncing. velocity becomes 80% of v, i.e.,
v
′
=+0.8
2gh
(positive sign because the direction of ball has reversed after bouncing and is upwards.
Applying third equation of motion again, for u=v
′
, v=0 and a=−g
v
2
=u
2
+2×a×x
Thus,
0=0.64(2gh)+2(−g)x
or
x=0.64h
Answer:
D.)it orbits near the Kepler belt
Explanation:
The Kuiper belt is an area similar to the asteroide belt extending from the orbit of Neptune to about 50 AU from the Sun. It mainly consists of icy asteroids and dwarf planets, which are rocky objects big enough to be defined as planet but that do not have enough gravity to clear their orbit from other obejcts.
Pluto was discovered in 1930 - initially it was classified as a planet, although it is much smaller than the other 8 planets of the Solar System. However, it has been recently de-classified to dwarf planet because its gravity is not enough to clear its orbit from other objects (asteroids). Pluto is located inside the Kuiper belt, so option D is correct. Other dwarf planets in the Kuiper belt are for instance Haumea and Makemake.
Answer:
Explanation:
The name of the article from which the quote "Physicists speak of the continuous dance of sub-atomic matter which goes on all the time. They have actually used the words dance of creation and destruction or energy dance." was taken from is Carl Sagan Fritjof Capra on The dance that reveals the mysteries of the universe-Part ll
