HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPf it is a good idea to
Answer:
The dimerization of butadiene to 4-vinylcyclohexene folows second order kinetics and its rate law will be given by :
![R=k[C_4H_6]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=R%3Dk%5BC_4H_6%5D%5E2)
Explanation:

The rate of the reaction ;
![R=k[C_4H_6]^x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=R%3Dk%5BC_4H_6%5D%5Ex)
As given in the question , that graph of time verses
was linear but plots of
or
was curved.
Generally:
Graph of time verses
for zero order reaction is linear with negative slope.
Graph of time verses
for secon order reaction is linear with negative slope.
Graph of time verses
for secon order reaction is linear with positive slope.
So, the dimerization of butadiene to 4-vinylcyclohexene folows second order kinetics and its rate law will be given by :
![R=k[C_4H_6]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=R%3Dk%5BC_4H_6%5D%5E2)
Answer:1.
1.Balanced equation
C4H10 + 9 02 ==> 5H20 +4CO2
2. Volume of CO2 =596L
Explanation:
1.Combustion of alkane is the reaction of alkanes with Oxygen. And the general equation for the combustion is;
CxHy +( x+y/4) O2 ==> y/2 02 + xCO2
Where x and y are number of carbon and hydrogen atoms respectively.
For butane (C4H10)
x=4 and y=10
Therefore
C4H10 + 9 02 ==> 5H20 +4CO2
2. Mass of butane = 0.360kg
Molar mass of C4H10 = ( 12×4 + 1×10)
= 48 +10=58g/mol= 0.058kg/mol
Mole = mass/molar mass
Mole = 0.360/0.058= 6.2moles
From the stoichiometric equation
1mole of C4H10 will gives 4moles of CO2
Therefore
6.2moles of C4H10 will gives 4 moles of 24.8 moles of CO2
Using the ideal gas equation
PV=nRT
P= 1.0atm
V=?
n= 24.8mol.
R=0.08206atmL/molK
T=20+273=293
V= 24.8 × 0.08206 × 293
V= 596L
Therefore the volume of CO2 produced is 596L
1%. I figured it out by looking it up i dum
Answer: Provided in the explanation section
Explanation:
Our questions says that:
It is usually assumed that an action potential begins immediately at the cathode. If this were true, both methods for calculating conduction velocity would provide the same answer. However, when a strong stimulus intensity is used, the action potential may begin some distance away from the cathode. Under these conditions, the difference method would be more accurate.Did you observe any important difference between the conduction velocity values?
Answer to this :
By using the difference method, you subtract out any "uncertainties" involved in the measurement of latencies. Say for example, saw we are uncertain as to where the AP's are actually originating within the vicinity of the stimulating electrodes, this "error" will be introduced into both latency measurements, and therefore subtracted out when performing a difference method calculation.
However, the difference method is only experimentally sound when one is dealing with the same population of nerve fibres over the recording electrodes used, which is not the case with the sciatic nerve, as it is a short nerve, and thin at one end.
The non-uniformity of the nerve, and the difficulty in making accurate measurements of very small distances and latencies are principal points to consider when making conduction velocity measurements. Naturally if the nerve studied were longer and more uniform, we would improve the accuracy of our calculations.
cheers i hope this helped !!!!