3-SAT ≤p TSP
If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time.
both the statements are true.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- 3-SAT ≤p TSP due to any complete problem of NP to other problem by exits of reductions.
- If P ¹ NP, then 3-SAT ≤p 2-SAT are the polynomial time algorithm are not for 3-SAT. In P, 2-SAT is found, 3- SAT polynomial time algorithm implies the exit of reductions. 3 SAT does not have polynomial time algorithm when P≠NP.
- If P ¹ NP, then no NP-complete problem can be solved in polynomial time. because for the NP complete problem individually gets the polynomial time algorithm for the others. It may be in P for all the problems, the implication of latter is P≠NP.
Dot 3 is mostly used in a lot of v4 and v6
Answer:
the maximum length of the specimen before deformation is 0.4366 m
Explanation:
Given the data in the question;
Elastic modulus E = 124 GPa = 124 × 10⁹ Nm⁻²
cross-sectional diameter D = 4.2 mm = 4.2 × 10⁻³ m
tensile load F = 1810 N
maximum allowable elongation Δl = 0.46 mm = 0.46 × 10⁻³ m
Now to calculate the maximum length 
for the deformation, we use the following relation;
= [ Δl × E × π × D² ] / 4F
so we substitute our values into the formula
= [ (0.46 × 10⁻³) × (124 × 10⁹) × π × (4.2 × 10⁻³)² ] / ( 4 × 1810 )
= 3161.025289 / 7240
= 0.4366 m
Therefore, the maximum length of the specimen before deformation is 0.4366 m
Answer:
yes.
Explanation:
because all websites use coding
Answer:
la escuela,en casa y listo...............
