No because there must be an even # if their is an even amount one of the forces isn’t being cancelled
Answer:
The magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push
Explanation:
Since the crate moves at a constant speed, there is no net acceleration and thus, my push is balanced by the frictional force on the crate. So, the magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push.
Let F = push and f = frictional force and f' = net force
F - f = f' since the crate moves at constant speed, acceleration is zero and thus f' = ma = m (0) = 0
So, F - f = 0
Thus, F = f
So, the magnitude of the force of friction equals the magnitude of my push.
Answer:
the electric field strength of this charge is two times the strength of the other charge
Explanation:
Using the relationship between electric field and the charge, which is inversely proportionality. Let the the magnitude of the first charge be Q and the respective electric field be E. It implies that;
E1/E2 = Q2/Q1
E2 = E1 x Q1/Q2
= E x Q/ (Q/2)
= 2E
Answer:
The intensity at 10° from the center is 3.06 × 10⁻⁴I₀
Explanation:
The intensity of light I = I₀(sinα/α)² where α = πasinθ/λ
I₀ = maximum intensity of light
a = slit width = 2.0 μm = 2.0 × 10⁻⁶ m
θ = angle at intensity point = 10°
λ = wavelength of light = 650 nm = 650 × 10⁻⁹ m
α = πasinθ/λ
= π(2.0 × 10⁻⁶ m)sin10°/650 × 10⁻⁹ m
= 1.0911/650 × 10³
= 0.001679 × 10³
= 1.679
Now, the intensity I is
I = I₀(sinα/α)²
= I₀(sin1.679/1.679)²
= I₀(0.0293/1.679)²
= 0.0175²I₀
= 0.0003063I₀
= 3.06 × 10⁻⁴I₀
So, the intensity at 10° from the center is 3.06 × 10⁻⁴I₀
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
