Distance is the total length covered = 2m + 3m = 5m
Displacement is his distance from original position.
Displacement = 2m + (-3)m. Representing the 3m walked back as -3.
Displacement = 2m - 3m = -1m.
So his displacement is 1m behind his original starting point.
The force constant is 2.145 N/m.
<h3>What is spring constant?</h3>
- The spring constant is the force required to stretch or compress a spring divided by the distance traveled by the spring. It is used to determine whether a spring is stable or unstable.
- K is the proportionality constant, also known as the 'spring constant.' Hooke's law (F = -kx) specifies stiffness and strength via the k variable. The greater the value of k, the greater the force required to stretch an object to a given length.
Using the relation;
T = 2π√m/k
T = time period = 0.45 s
m = mass of object in kilograms = 0.011kg
k = spring constant
To find k based on the formula,
k = 4 × (3.142)^2 × 0.011 / (0.45 )^2
k = 2.145 N/m
Therefore the force constant is 2.145 N/m.
To learn more about force refer to :
brainly.com/question/12785175
#SPJ4
Missing questions: "find the speed of the electron".
Solution:
the magnetic force experienced by a charged particle in a magnetic field is given by
where
q is the particle charge
v its velocity
B the magnitude of the magnetic field
the angle between the directions of v and B.
Re-arranging the formula, we find:
and by substituting the data of the problem (the charge of the electron is
), we find the velocity of the electron:
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
