1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
8

A camera with a 50.0-mm focal length lens is being used to photograph a person standing 3.00 m away. (a) How far from the lens m

ust the film be? (b) If the film is 36.0 mm high, what fraction of a 1.75-m-tall person will fit on it? (c) Discuss how reasonable this seems, based on your experience in taking or posing for photographs.
Physics
1 answer:
kirill [66]3 years ago
3 0

a) 50.8 mm

b) The whole image (1:1)

c) It seems reasonable

Explanation:

a)

To project the image on the film, the distance of the film from the lens must be equal to the distance of the image from the lens. This can be found by using the lens equation:

\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}

where

f is the focal length of the lens

p is the distance of the object from the lens

q is the distance of the image from the lens

In this problem:

f = 50.0 mm = 0.050 m is the focal length (positive for a convex lens)

p = 3.00 m is the distance of the person from the lens

Therefore, we can find q:

\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{0.050}-\frac{1}{3.00}=19.667m^{-1}\\q=\frac{1}{19.667}=0.051 m=50.8 mm

b)

Here we need to find the height of the image first.

This can be done by using the magnification equation:

\frac{y'}{y}=-\frac{q}{p}

where:

y' is the height of the image

y = 1.75 m is the height of the real person

q = 50.8 mm = 0.0508 m is the distance of the image from the lens

p = 3.00 m is the distance of the person from the lens

Solving for y', we find:

y'=-\frac{qy}{p}=-\frac{(0.0508)(1.75)}{3.00}=-0.0296 m=-29.6mm

(the negative sign means the image is inverted)

Therefore, the size of the image (29.6 mm) is smaller than the size of the film (36.0 mm), so the whole image can fit into the film.

c)

This seems reasonable: in fact, with a 50.0 mm focal length, if we try to take the picture of a person at a distance of 3.00 m, we are able to capture the whole image of the person in the photo.

You might be interested in
Why is it advisable to wear long sleeves when a student works in a chemistry lab
love history [14]

So then if they do spill the chemical then it gets on their cloths and not on then it dosen"t harm them instead it ruins their shirt.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The image to the left shows Earth’s major plates. A geologist is studying a plate boundary indicated by the arrow. Fill in the b
nexus9112 [7]

Answer:

The Eurasian Plate

Explanation:

The Eurasian plate is one of the most extended on Earth, crossing all of Asia and Europe. The Eurasian plate is between the North American and the African Plates on the north and west sides. The Eurasian plate crushed up above the Indian plate. The  Tibetan plateau and the Himalayan mountain range formed due to the crush between the Eurasian Plate and Indian Plate, which started 50 million years ago.

3 0
3 years ago
A patient has an ongoing history of cancer. She has a tumor in the abdominal region, and has been undergoing treatment for it. T
Vadim26 [7]

Answer:

the answer is at the BOTTOM OF THEIR QUESTION

Explanation:

IT IS CORRECT BTW

6 0
3 years ago
Ricardo, of mass 80 kg, and Carmelita, who is lighter, are enjoying Lake Merced at dusk in a 30 kg canoe. When the canoe is at r
Deffense [45]

Answer:

m=57.65 kg

Explanation:

Given Data

Ricardo mass m₁=80 kg

Canoe mass m₂=30 kg

Canoe Length L= 3 m

Canoe moves x=40 cm

When Canoe was at rest the net total torque is zero.

Let the center of mass is at x distance from the canoe center and it will be towards the Ricardo cause. So the toque around the center of mass is given as

m_{1}(L/2-x)=m_{2}x+m_{2}(L/2-x)

We have to find m₂.To find the value of m₂ first we need figure out the value of.As they changed their positions the center of mass moved to other side by distance 2x.

so

2x=40

x=40/2

x=20 cm

Substitute in the above equation we get

m_{x}=\frac{m_{1}(L/2-x)-m_{2}x }{L/2+x}\\m_{x}=\frac{80(\frac{3}{2}-0.2 )-30*0.2}{3/2+0.2}\\m_{x}=57.65 kg

4 0
3 years ago
Which best describes the relationship between the direction of energy and wave motion in a transverse wave?
sammy [17]
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is the second option. The relationship between the direction of energy and wave motion in a transverse wave would be the <span>energy direction is perpendicular to the motion of the wave. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • William Herschel thought that the Sun and Earth were roughly at the center of the great grouping of stars we call the Milky Way.
    9·2 answers
  • One horsepower is a unit of power equal to 746 W. How much energy can a 150 horsepower engine transform in 10.0 seconds
    15·1 answer
  • Move the magnet at a relatively constant frequency back and forth through the coil. The voltage displayed is proportional to the
    7·1 answer
  • jennys history teacher always sets the tempature in her classroom very low jenny always shivers when she is in class because she
    15·2 answers
  • What is the definition of bacteria ?
    7·2 answers
  • An object is pushed with a force of 50 Newtons and accelerates at 25 m/s2 . What is the object’s mass?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Using the data from M7:<br>Which four countries are the worst in releasing CO2?​
    15·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between an object’s temperature and its heat?
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone please explain the conservation of momentum? I want to be a rocket scientist lol
    14·1 answer
  • Say what main energy change
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!