<span>Ethoxyethane; trifluoroborane; BF3.Et2O; Boron trifluoride ethyl ether; Boron trifluoride diethyl ether; Boron trifluoride-diethyl ether; Boron
</span>
Answer: A)There is a high ratio of energy to cost
Positives:
A Chunk of Uranium can power a city a lot longer than a chunk of coal.
It also does not contribute to pollution since what comes out of the tower is steam.
Negatives:
It is very expensive to build and maintain a nuclear power plant at first so investors whom want money up front are more reluctant to loan money for one.
If the plant does melt down it is very bad for the enviroment and its people, for example Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in the Ukraine will not be able to be lived in for approximently 20,000 years.
Answer:
Increase in the concentration of the reactants (vinegar and baking soda) leads to an increase in the rate of reaction (more volume of CO2 is evolved within a shorter time)
Explanation:
The chemical reaction between baking soda and vinegar in water is shown in the chemical reaction equation below;
NaHCO3(aq) + CH3COOH(aq) ----->CO2(g) + H2O(l) + CH3COONa(aq)
The chemical name of baking soda is sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) while vineager is a dilute acetic acid (CH3COOH) solution. This reaction provides a very easy set up in which we can study the effect of concentration on the rate of chemical reaction.
We must have it behind our minds that increase in the concentration of reactant species increases the rate of chemical reaction. Secondly, the rate of the reaction between baking soda and vinegar can be monitored by observing the volume of CO2 evolved and how quickly it evolves from the reaction mixture.
We can now postulate a hypothesis which states that; 'increase in the concentration of the reactants (vinegar and baking soda) leads to an increase in the rate of reaction (more volume of CO2 is evolved within a shorter time).'
If we go ahead to subject this hypothesis to experimental test, it will be confirmed to be true because a greater volume of CO2 will be evolved within a shorter time as the concentration of the reactants increases.
Answer:
<span>Formula New Combination Predicted Formula
</span>
NaCl potassium + chlorine KCl
AlCl₃ aluminum + fluorine AlF₃
CO₂ tin + oxygen SnO₂
MgCl₂ calcium + bromine CaBr₂
HCl cesium + iodine CsI
<span>
CCl₄ silicon + bromine SiBr₄</span>
Explanation:
1) The question is incomplete. The first part is missing.
This is the first part of the question.
<span>Applying
the principle that the elements of a particular column in the Periodic
Table share the same chemical properties, complete the following chart.
The first one has been done for you.
</span>
2) This is the given chart:
<span>Formula New Combination Predicted Formula
</span>
Cu₂O silver + oxygen Ag₂O ← this is the example.
NaCl potassium + chlorine
<span>
AlCl₃ aluminum + fluorine </span>
CO₂ tin + oxygen
<span>
MgCl₂ calcium + bromine </span>
<span>
HCl cesium + iodine </span>
<span>
CCl₄ silicon + bromine
</span>
3) This is how you find the new formula to complete the chart.
i) NaCl potassium + chlorine
Since potassium is in the same group of sodium, you predict that in the new formula Na is replaced by K giving KCl.
ii) AlCl₃ aluminum + fluorine
Since fluorine is in the same group that Al, then you predict that in the new formula Cl is replaced by F leading to AlF₃
iii) CO₂ tin + oxygen
Since tin is in the same group that C, you predict that in the new formula C is replaced by Sn leading to SnO₂
iv) MgCl₂ calcium + bromine
Since calcium is in the same group that Mg, and bromine is in the same group that Cl, you predict thea in the new formula calcium replaces Mg and bromine replaces Cl, leading to CaBr₂
v) HCl cesium + iodine
Since H is in the same column that cesium and Cl is in the same colum that iodine, you predict that in the new formula Cs replaces H and I replaces Cl leading to: CsI
<span>
vi) CCl₄ silicon + bromine
</span>
Since silicon is in the same column that C and bromine is in the same column that Cl, you predict that in the new formula Si replaces C and Br replaces Cl, leading to SiBr₄
1L = 33.814 oz
xL = 2.75 oz
so it's a proportion
1L / 33.814 oz = xL / 2.75
solve for x
(1/33.814) * 2.75 = 0.0813272609 on your calculator, but it's not the answer.
the number in your problem, 2.75 oz, has 3 significant figures. so you can only round this number to 3 significant figures too.
your equipment isn't accurate enough to give a reading to 10 significant figures if that makes sense. you have to give the answer in terms of the term you use with the lowest significant figures.
so with 3 significant figures,
0.0813272609 rounds to
0.0813 L
