Answer:
The strongest gravitational attraction between the two objects will be experienced when the distance between the two objects is smallest.
Explanation:
According to Newton's law of universal gravitation, the force of attraction between two objects is proportional to the products of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance of separation between the two objects. This attraction between objects is known as gravity and it applies to all objects in the universe.
From the law of universal gravitation, since their is an inverse square relationship between gravitational force and the distance of separation between two interacting objects, an increase in the distance of separation will result in weaker gravitational forces. For example, if the distance of separation between two objects is increased by a factor of 2, then the force of gravitational attraction is decreased by a factor of 4 (since 2² = 4). However, if the distance of separation between the two objects is decreased by a factor of two, i.e. is halved, then the force of gravitational attraction is increased by a factor of 4.
Thus, the strongest gravitational attraction between the two objects will be experienced when the distance between the two objects is smallest.
Answer:
Since with LiBr no precipitation takes place. So, Ag+ is absent
When we add Li2SO4 to it, precipitation takes place.
Ca2+(aq) + SO42-(aq) ----> CaSO4(s) ...Precipitate
Thus, Ca2+ is present.
When Li3PO4 is added, again precipitation takes place.Reaction is:
Co2+(aq) + PO43-(aq)---->Co3(PO4)2(s) ... Precipitate
A. Ca2+ and Co2+ are present in solution
B. Ca2+(aq) + SO42-(aq) ----> CaSO4(s)
C. 3Co2+(aq) + 2PO43-(aq)---->Co3(PO4)2(s)
It seems more and more there are fewer conservation organizations who speak for the forest, and more that speak for the timber industry. Witness several recent commentaries in Oregon papers that are by no means unique. I’ve seen similar themes from other conservation groups across the West in recent years.
Many conservation groups have uncritically adopted views that support more logging of our public lands based upon increasingly disputed ideas about forest health and fire ecology, as well as the age-old bias against natural processes like wildfire and beetles.
For instance, an article in the Portland Oregonian quotes Oregon Wild’s executive director Sean Stevens bemoaning the closure of a timber mill in John Day Oregon. Stevens said: “Loss of the 29-year-old Malheur Lumber Co. mill would be ‘a sad turn of events’” Surprisingly, Oregon Wild is readily supporting federal subsidies to promote more logging on the Malheur National Forest to sustain the mill.
Trueeeee !! :D it’s true because they change properties
