Luster I think is what you are looking for
Answer:
According to Coulomb's Law, the potential energy of two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of the two charges and inversely proportional to the distance between the charges
Explanation:
According to Coulomb's Law, the potential energy of two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of the two charges and inversely proportional to the distance between the charges. Since the potential energy of two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of the two charges, its magnitude increases as the charges of the particles increases. For like charges, the potential energy is positive(the product of the two alike charges must be positive) and since potential energy is inversely proportional to the distance between the charges therefore it decreases as the particles get farther apart . For opposite charges, the potential energy is negative(the product of the two opposite charges must be negative) and since potential energy is inversely proportional to the distance between the two charges, it becomes more negative as the particles get closer together.
Answer:
t = 1.75
t = 0.04
Explanation:
a)
For part 1 we want to use a kenamatic equation with constant acceleration:
X = 1/2*a*t^2
isolate time
t = sqrt(2X / a)
Plugin known variables. Acceleration is the force of gravity which is 9.8 m/s^2
t = sqrt(2*15m / 9.8m/s^2)
t = 1.75 s
b)
The speed of sound travels at a constant speed therefore we don't need acceleration and can use the equation:
v = d / t
isolate time
t = d / v
plug in known variables
t = 15m / 340m/s
t = 0.04 s
Answer:
c) 11.9 yr
Explanation:
The orbital period is proportional to r^(3/2) and does not depend on the satellite's mass. Any object at Jupiter position will have the same orbital period regardless of mass.
By keppler's law we know that
T^2= r^3
T= orbital time period
r= mean distance of the planet from the Sun.
clearly, The orbital period does not depend on the satellite's mass
there, the correct answer will be c= 11.9 yr.
The two wires carry current in opposite directions: this means that if we see them from above, the magnetic field generated by one wire is clock-wise, while the magnetic field generated by the other wire is anti-clockwise. Therefore, if we take a point midway between the two wires, the resultant magnetic field at this point is just the sum of the two magnetic fields, since they act in the same direction.
Therefore, we should calculate the magnetic field generated by each wire and then calculate their sum. We are located at a distance r=0.10 m from each wire.
The magnetic field generated by wire 1 is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acd99/acd99ee8a9dd2d7fcd427349676ae686a9e642ef" alt="B_1= \frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r}= \frac{(4 \pi \cdot 10^{-7} NA^{-2} )(20 A)}{2 \pi (0.10 m)}= 4 \cdot 10^{-5}T"
The magnetic field generated by wire 2 is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/827b0/827b03e6e339248a277d15b37c3af3d4cc12cf63" alt="B_2= \frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r}= \frac{(4 \pi \cdot 10^{-7} NA^{-2} )(5.0 A)}{2 \pi (0.10 m)}= 1 \cdot 10^{-5}T"
And so, the resultant magnetic field at the point midway between the two wires is