Answer:
correct option is (A) 0.5
Explanation:
given data
axial column load = 250 kN per meter
footing placed = 0.5 m
cohesion = 25 kPa
internal friction angle = 5°
solution
we know angle of internal friction is 5° that is near to 0°
so it means the soil is almost cohesive soil.
and for a pure cohesive soil
= 0
and we know formula for is
= (Nq - 1 ) × tan(Ф) ..................1
so here Ф is very less should be nearest to zero
and its value can be 0.5
so correct option is (A) 0.5
Drip irrigation
Drip irrigation is one of the most efficient types of irrigation systems. The efficiency of applied and lost water as well as meeting the crop water need ranges from 80% to 90%
The question is incomplete. The complete question is :
The solid rod shown is fixed to a wall, and a torque T = 85N?m is applied to the end of the rod. The diameter of the rod is 46mm .
When the rod is circular, radial lines remain straight and sections perpendicular to the axis do not warp. In this case, the strains vary linearly along radial lines. Within the proportional limit, the stress also varies linearly along radial lines. If point A is located 12 mm from the center of the rod, what is the magnitude of the shear stress at that point?
Solution :
Given data :
Diameter of the rod : 46 mm
Torque, T = 85 Nm
The polar moment of inertia of the shaft is given by :
J = 207.6 
So the shear stress at point A is :
Therefore, the magnitude of the shear stress at point A is 4913.29 MPa.
Answer:
Explanation: Here it is: 67 Hope that helps! :)
Answer:
a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.
b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.
Explanation:
The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.
The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.
As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.
She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.
