1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
scoundrel [369]
3 years ago
13

The upper body primal movement patterns are

Physics
1 answer:
kramer3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Bend to extend. Bending with a hips back movement, back straight, feet flat and forward. ...

Squat. This is a hips down motion. ...

Lunge. This is a long, linear stride, lowering your back knee to just above the ground, with a completely upright torso. ...

Rotate. ...

Push. ...

Pull. ...

Gait.

You might be interested in
PLZ ANSWER!!! QUICKLY
grandymaker [24]
Light because they need light to grow

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For a projectile launched horizontally, which of the following best describes the downward component of a projectile's velocity?
Angelina_Jolie [31]

C. The downward component of the projectile's velocity continually increases

Explanation:

The motion of a projectile consists of two independent motions:  

- A uniform motion (with constant velocity) along the horizontal direction  

- A uniformly accelerated motion, with constant acceleration (equal to the acceleration of gravity) in the downward direction  

Here we want to study the downward component of the projectile's velocity. Since the vertical motion is a uniformly accelerated motion, the vertical velocity is given by:

v=u+at

where

u = 0 is the initial vertical velocity (zero since the projectile is fired horizontally)

a=g=9.8 m/s^2 downward is the acceleration of gravity

t is the time

So the equation becomes

v=gt

This means that

C. The downward component of the projectile's velocity continually increases

Because every second, it increases by 9.8 m/s in the downward direction.

Learn more about projectile motion:

brainly.com/question/8751410

#LearnwithBrainly

8 0
4 years ago
Jill does twice as much work as Jack does and in half the time. Jill's power output is Group of answer choices one-fourth as muc
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

Second Choice.

Explanation:

Jack's Power = W/t

Jill's Power = 2W/(0.5)*t

2/0.5 = 4

Jill's Power = 4*W/t

Jill's Power is 4 times greater than Jack's

Second Choice

3 0
3 years ago
What total mass must be converted into energy
Eduardwww [97]

This question apparently wants you to get comfortable
with  E = m c² .  But I must say, this question is a lame
way to do it.

c = 3 x 10⁸ m/s
                                                    E = m c²

                           1.03 x 10⁻¹³ joule  =  (m) (3 x 10⁸ m/s)²

Divide each side by (3 x 10⁸ m/s)²:

                         Mass = (1.03 x 10⁻¹³ joule) / (9 x 10¹⁶ m²/s²)

                                   =  (1.03 / 9) x (10⁻¹³ ⁻ ¹⁶) (kg)

                                   =        1.144 x 10⁻³⁰  kg .    (choice-1)

This is roughly the mass of (1 and 1/4) electrons, so it seems
that it could never happen in nature.  The question is just an
exercise in arithmetic, and not a particularly interesting one.
______________________________________

Something like this could have been much more impressive:
 
The Braidwood Nuclear Power Generating Station in northeastern
Ilinois USA serves Chicago and northern Illinois with electricity.
<span>The station has two pressurized water reactors, which can generate
a net total of 2,242 megawatts at full capacity, making it the largest
nuclear plant in the state.
If the Braidwood plant were able to completely convert mass
to energy, how much mass would it need to convert in order
to provide the total electrical energy that it generates in a year,
operating at full capacity ?

Energy = (2,242 x 10⁶ joule/sec) x (86,400 sec/day) x (365 da/yr)

             =  (2,242 x 10⁶ x 86,400 x 365) joules

             =          7.0704 x 10¹⁶ joules .

How much converted mass is that ?

                                           E  =  m c²

Divide each side by  c² :    Mass  =  E / c² .
c = 3 x 10⁸ m/s

              Mass = (7.0704 x 10¹⁶ joules) / (9 x 10¹⁶ m²/s²)

                        =        0.786 kilogram ! ! !

THAT should impress us !  If I've done the arithmetic correctly,
then roughly  (1 pound  11.7 ounces) of mass, if completely
converted to energy, would provide all the energy generated
by the largest nuclear power plant in Illinois, operating at max
capacity for a year !

</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED HELP ON THIS QUESTION!
Leto [7]

The second option is the correct one. m/s^2

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • For a machine to be a heat engine, what kind of conversion must it perform?
    10·2 answers
  • Object A attracts object B with a gravitational force of 10 newtons from a given distance. If the distance between the two objec
    8·1 answer
  • Willing to give a brainliest!
    6·2 answers
  • I need some help plz!
    8·1 answer
  • The particles of a medium will settle the rest position after a mechanical wave passes
    13·2 answers
  • A student is conducting a physics experiment and rolls four different-
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a chemical change?
    13·2 answers
  • A 1.5m wire carries a 6 A current when a potential difference of 70 V is applied. What is the resistance of the wire?
    9·1 answer
  • Density of water is 1000kg/meter cube. what will be the volume of 35000kg water ​
    6·1 answer
  • As an astronaunt travels from the surface of the earth to a postion that is four times
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!