Answer: I think its C or B
Explanation: Hope this was helpful....
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, given the acid, we can suppose a simple dissociation as:
Which occurs in aqueous phase, therefore, the law of mass action is written by:
![Ka=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ka%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
That in terms of the change 
due to the reaction's extent we can write:
But we prefer to compute the Kb due to its exceptional weakness:
Next, the acid dissociation in the presence of the base we have:
![Kb=\frac{[OH^-][HA]}{[A^-]}=1x10^{6}=\frac{x*x}{0.1-x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Kb%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BOH%5E-%5D%5BHA%5D%7D%7B%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%3D1x10%5E%7B6%7D%3D%5Cfrac%7Bx%2Ax%7D%7B0.1-x%7D)
Whose solution is 
which equals the concentration of hydroxyl in the solution, thus we compute the pOH:
![pOH=-log([OH^-])=-log(0.0999)=1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=pOH%3D-log%28%5BOH%5E-%5D%29%3D-log%280.0999%29%3D1)
Finally, since the maximum scale is 14, we can compute the pH by knowing the pOH:
Regards.
Answer:
hope its not to late..............Samira's model correctly demonstrates how the properties changed with the rearrangement of the atoms. However not all atoms are accounted for. There is a missing reactant. Samira's model correctly demonstrated how the atoms in two compounds reacted to form two new products. However, the elements present in the reactants side should be the elements that make up the new products in the product side. But as the diagram shows, Sameera has mistakenly added a new element to one of her products which will be wrong.
Explanation:
Answer:
variations of the same species
Explanation:
hope this helps have a good day
