1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
elena55 [62]
3 years ago
11

As potential and kinetic energy increase what happens to mechanical energy?

Physics
2 answers:
Tom [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

svp [43]3 years ago
7 0
A explanation a explanation
You might be interested in
A box is against a wall. A person pushes on the box, but the box does not move. Is this situation an example of a force
Leya [2.2K]

Answer: I don’t think so, because the box is ALREADY against the wall so you can’t move it further into the wall

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A tank whose bottom is a mirror is filled with water to a depth of 20.0 cm. A small fish floats motionless 7.0 cm under the surf
liberstina [14]

Answer:

The apparent depth of (a) the fish is 5.3 cm and (b) the image of the fish is 24.8 cm.

Explanation:

According to the following equation:

\frac{n_{w} }{s} +\frac{n_{a} }{s'} = \frac{n_{a}- n_{w}}{R_{c} } \\

where <em>nw</em> and <em>na</em> is the refractive indices of water (1.33) and air (1.00) respectively; <em>s</em> is the depth of the fish below the surface of the water; s' is the apparent depth of the fish from normal incidence and Rc is the radius of curvature of the mirror at the bottom of the tank.

Note that the bottom of the tank is assumed to be a flat mirror, therefore the radius of curvature is very large (R⇒∞).

Therefore, the above equation can be expressed as:

\frac{n_{w}}{s} +\frac{n_{a}}{s'}=0

Now we can solve for the apparent depth of the fish.

(a) s'=-(\frac{n_{a}}{n_{w}})x s (Make s' subject of the formula from the above equation)

s'=(\frac{1.00}{1.33} )x7cm

∴ s'=5.3 cm.

(b) The motionless fish floats 13 cm above the mirror, therefore the image of the fish will be situated at 13 + 20 =33 cm away from the real fish.

Therefore, s = 33 cm

s'=-(\frac{n_{a}}{n_{w}})x s

s'=(\frac{1.00}{1.33} )x 33 cm

s'=24.8 cm.

NB: Here, it is assumed that the water is pure, as impurities may alter the refractive index of water.

8 0
4 years ago
A 50 kg cheetah has 3,600 J of kinetic energy. What is its velocity?
stira [4]
To determine the velocity, let us use the equation:

v = √\frac{2K}{m}

The kinetic energy (K) is equivalent to 3,600 J, and mass (m) is equivalent to 50kg.  Let us now solve for velocity.

v = √\frac{2K}{m}
v = √\frac{2 (3,600 J)}{50 kg}
v = √\frac{7,200}{50}
v = √144
v = 12

The velocity of the tiger is 12 meter/second.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A 200-Ω resistor is connected in series with a 10-µF capacitor and a 60-Hz, 120-V (rms) line voltage. If electrical energy costs
Vika [28.1K]

Answer:

Cost to leave this circuit connected for 24 hours is $ 3.12.

Explanation:

We know that,

\mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{c}}=\frac{1}{2 \pi \mathrm{fc}}

f = frequency (60 Hz)

c= capacitor (10 µF = 10^-6)  

\mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{c}}=\text { Capacitive reactance }

Substitute the given values

\mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{c}}=\frac{1}{2 \times 3.14 \times 10 \times 10^{-6} \times 60}

\mathrm{X}_{\mathrm{c}}=\frac{1}{3.768 \times 10^{-3}}

\mathrm{x}_{\mathrm{c}}=265.39 \Omega

Given that, R = 200 Ω

X^{2}=R^{2}+X c^{2}

X^{2}=200^{2}+265.39^{2}

X^{2}=40000+70431.85

X^{2}=110431.825

x=\sqrt{110431.825}

X = 332.31 Ω

\text { Current }(I)=\frac{V}{R}

\text { Current }(I)=\frac{120}{332.31}

Current (I) = 0.361 amps

“Real power” is only consumed in the resistor,  

\mathrm{I}^{2} \mathrm{R}=0.361^{2} \times 200

\mathrm{I}^{2} \mathrm{R}=0.1303 \times 200

\mathrm{I}^{2} \mathrm{R}=26.06 \mathrm{Watts} \sim 26 \mathrm{watts}

In one hour 26 watt hours are used.

Energy used in 54 hours = 26 × 24 = 624 watt hours

E = 0.624 kilowatt hours

Cost = (5)(0.624) = 3.12  

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statement is FALSE about momentum? (Consider the formula p = mv .)
Kaylis [27]

<em>"A less massive object can never have more momentum than a more massive object."</em>

That statement is FALSE, because momentum doesn't only depend on mass alone.  It also depends on the speed with which the mass is moving. If the less massive object is moving at a tremendous speed, then it's quite possible for it to have more momentum than a more massive object.

A nice example is:  <em>A brick wall.</em> The brick wall is not moving at all. Its speed is zero, so it has NO momentum. An ant crawling along on top of the brick wall has more momentum than the brick wall itself has.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are all the​ noncurrent-carrying metal parts bonded together in a wiring​ system?
    15·1 answer
  • What effect does adding more loops to the wire coil have on the electromagnet?
    11·1 answer
  • When a gun is fired at the shooting range, the gun recoils (moves backward). Explain this using the law of conservation of momen
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think that the color of materials used for designing the seating of wheel chair has any role in regulating the heat? Expl
    6·1 answer
  • Movement of a stationary object
    15·1 answer
  • An object falls from the Transco Tower in Houston and takes 15 seconds to reach the ground.
    10·1 answer
  • Science in the study of the natural world through. And.
    11·1 answer
  • Simple physics question
    10·1 answer
  • Optical tweezers use light from a laser to move single atoms and molecules around. Suppose the intensity of light from the tweez
    12·1 answer
  • What is the plate of bolknic​
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!