A potential problem is that you are willing to accept a <u>5% </u>chance of being wrong if you reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis if it is true. For example, a significance level of 0.05 indicates a 5% risk of concluding that there is a difference when there is actually no difference. Rejecting the true null hypothesis results in a Type I error.
The smaller the value of α the more difficult it is to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, choosing a low value for α can reduce the likelihood of Type I errors. The result here is that if the null hypothesis is false, it may be more difficult to reject using a lower value for α. The alpha value or statistical significance threshold is arbitrary. Which value to use depends on your field of study.
Learn more about The potential problems here:-brainly.com/question/21836542
#SPJ4
Answer:
The three types of thermal expansions are Linear expansion , Superficial expansion and Cubical expansion
The strength of the friction doesn't matter. Neither does the distance or the time the asteroid takes to stop. All that matters is that the asteroid has
1/2 (mass) (speed squared)
of kinetic energy when it lands, and zero when it stops.
So
1/2 (mass) (original speed squared)
is the energy it loses to friction in order to come to rest.
1. Vpa = 180m/s. @ 0 deg.
Vag = 40m/s @ 120 deg,CCW.
<span>
Vpg = Vpa + Vag,
Vpg = (180 + 40cos120) + i40sin120,
Vpg = 160 + i34.64,
Vpg=sqrt((160)^2 + (34.64)^2)=163.7m/s.
</span>
<span>2. tanA = Y / X = 34.64 / 160 = 0.2165,
A = 12.2 deg,CCW. = 12.2deg. North of
East. </span>
3. 1 hr = 3600s. <span>d = Vt = 163.7m/s * 3600s = 589,320m.
hope this helps</span>
