Which option identifies a factor that would make the reasoning for a claim scientifically invalid?

Physics

1 answer:

lora16 [44]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C)a lack of supporting empirical evidence

Explanation:

A scientific reasoning can be rendered invalid if empirical evidences are lacking. Empirical evidences are usually a product of observations or experiments.

When these are lacking or cannot be gathered, scientific observations or sometimes reasoning can be rendered as invalid because there is no ground to prove them.

You might be interested in

Time dilation means that

Anastaziya [24]

The answer is D. time really does pass more slowly in a rest frame of reference relative to a frame of reference that is moving

5 0

2 years ago

Why does the candle light has no shadow when light fall on it?

andrezito [222]

Shadows are the absence of light, they are created when an object blocks light. In other words, shadows are the product of light particles, known as photons. These particles “bounce off” of the object without reaching the other side. Therefore light by itself will not form a shadow.

6 0

2 years ago

Two small metal spheres are 25 cm apaft.The spheres have equal amount of negative charge and repel each other with a force of 0.

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

$0.5\times 10^{-6}C$

Explanation:

According to coulombs law force between two charges is given by $F=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon _0}\frac{Q_1Q_2}{R^2}$ here R is the distance between both the charges which is given as 25 cm