Which option identifies a factor that would make the reasoning for a claim scientifically invalid?

Physics

1 answer:

lora16 [44]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

C)a lack of supporting empirical evidence

Explanation:

A scientific reasoning can be rendered invalid if empirical evidences are lacking. Empirical evidences are usually a product of observations or experiments.

When these are lacking or cannot be gathered, scientific observations or sometimes reasoning can be rendered as invalid because there is no ground to prove them.

You might be interested in

What would decrease the resistance of wires carrying an electric current

Murljashka [212]

I believe the answer is A. shorter wires

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Define force and provide an example

ollegr [7]

Answer:

force-strength,power or energy as an attribute of motion, movement or action. Example: Frictional force.

4 0

3 years ago

A subducting oceanic plate

beks73 [17]

Maybe this would help understand it better.

Tectonic plates can transport both continental crust and oceanic crust, or they may be made of only one kind of crust. Oceanic crust is denser than continental crust. At a subduction zone, the oceanic crust usually sinks into the mantle beneath lighter continental crust

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose multiple stations are connected in wired network where CSMA/CD implemented. Among them, station A wants to communicate w

anastassius [24]

Answer:

bro i think ur from the uni of arid agriculture rawalpindi and today is your networking paper

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

by how many times occur in the force of attraction between two bodies change when the distance between then is reduced to one th

xenn [34]

Answer:

The force is now 9 times the original force

Explanation:

Coulomb's Law

The electrostatic force between two charged particles is directly proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

Coulomb's formula is:

$\displaystyle F=k\frac{q_1q_2}{d^2}$