Answer:
-320 μJ.
Explanation:
Consider a point with an electrical charge of 
. Assume that 
is the electrical potential at the position of that charge. The electrical potential of that point charge will be equal to:
.
Keep in mind that since both and might not be positive, the size of the electrical potential energy might not be positive, either.
For this point charge,
; (that's -8.0 microjoules, which equals to 
)
.
Hence its electrical potential energy:
.
Why is this value negative? The electrical potential energy of a charge is equal to the work needed to bring that charge from infinitely far away all the way to its current position. Also, negative charges are attracted towards regions of high electrical potential. Bringing this 
negative charge to the origin will not require any external work. Instead, this process will release 320 μJ of energy. As a result, the electrical potential energy is a negative value.
Answer:
The contribution of the wavelets lying on the back of the wave front is zero because of something known as the Obliquity Factor. It is assumed that the amplitude of the secondary wavelets is not independent of the direction of propagation, Sources: byju's.com
Use the Pythagoras for the magnitude and the tan^-1 x = -1 for the angle
displacement = 4^2 + 4^2 = 32 = 4 sqrt(2) = 5.65 km
angle is 135 degrees.
The best answer would be the second option B) because that is NOT part of the Kinetic Molecular Theory.
An object is in motion when its distance from another object is changing.
