Answer:
Explanation:
speed of motor (N)=1500 rpm
power=4 hp = =2.9828 KW
service factor(k)= 2.75
now,
torque rating
When testing a compressor with an ohm meter, a technician read 2 ohms between the start terminal and the case of the compressor.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
The <em>equivalent force-couple system</em> at O is the force and couple experienced when at point O due to the applied force at point A
The <em>equivalent force couple</em> system at O due to force <em>F</em> are;
Force, F = (<u>8.65·i - 4.6·j</u>) KN
Couple, M₀ ≈ <u>40.9 </u>k kN·m
The reason the above values are correct is as follows:
The known values for the <em>cantilever</em> are;
The <em>height </em>of the beam = 0.65 m
The <em>magnitude of </em>the applied <em>force</em>, F = 9.8 kN
The <em>length </em>of the beam = 4.9 m
The <em>angle </em>away from the vertical the force is applied = 26°
The required parameter:
The <em>equivalent force-couple system</em> at the centroid of the beam cross-section of the cantilever
Solution:
The <em>equivalent force-couple system</em> is the force-couple system that can replace the given force at centroid of the beam cross-section at the cantilever O ;
The <em>equivalent force</em> = 9.8 kN × cos(28°)·i - 9.8 kN × sin(28°)·j
Which gives;
The <em>equivalent force</em> ≈ (<u>8.65·i - 4.6·j</u>) KN
The <em>couple </em><em>acting </em>at point O due to the force <em>F</em> is given as follows;
The <em>clockwise moment</em> = <em>9.8 kN × cos(28°) × 4.9</em>
The <em>anticlockwise moment</em> = <em>9.8 kN × sin(28°) 0.65/2 </em>
The sum of the moments = Anticlockwise moment - Clockwise moments
∴ The <em>sum </em>of the moments, ∑M, gives the moment acting at point O as follows;
M₀ = <em>9.8 kN × sin(28°) 0.65/2 - 9.8 kN × cos(28°) × 4.9</em> ≈ 40.9 kN·m
The couple acting at O, due to F, M₀ ≈ <u>40.9 kN·m</u>
The equivalent force couple system acting at point O due the force, F, is as follows
F = (8.65·i - 4.6·j) KN
M₀ ≈ <u>40.9 </u>k kN·m
Learn more about equivalent force systems here:
Answer:
attached below
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is "". A further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
- Throughout all the three instances (worst, average as well as best), the time complexity including its Merge sort seems to be
as the merge form often splits the array into two halves together tends to linear time to combine multiple halves.
- As an unsorted array, it needs an equivalent amount of unnecessary capacity. Therefore, large unsorted arrays are not appropriate for having to search.