All categories

3 years ago

Compare the physical sciences to the life sciences.

2 answers:

6 0

1.Life science involves fields of discipline catering to living organisms such as we humans while physical science caters to non-living organisms.

2.Life science has more fields of discipline than physical science.

3.Physical science relies on laws and theories to explain concepts while life science relies on biological explanations and can also rely on theories.

arsen [322]3 years ago

6 0

Physical science is concerned with the study of natural but non-living objects, while life science is the scientific study of living organisms. There is also a field called biophysics, which is where physics theories and methods are used to study biological systems.

You might be interested in

What is the value of acceleration due to gravity at the pole, equator and the centre of the earth

fgiga [73]

Answer:

In combination, the equatorial bulge and the effects of the surface centrifugal force due to rotation mean that sea-level gravity increases from about 9.780 m/s2 at the Equator to about 9.832 m/s2 at the poles, so an object will weigh approximately 0.5% more at the poles than at the Equator.

7 0

2 years ago

The fact that Mercury has no atmosphere is evidence that it _____.

Naddika [18.5K]

We want to know what does the fact that Mercury has no atmosphere tell us. Since Mercury has no atmosphere it cant reflect a lot of sunlight that is hitting its surface. Its constantly being hit by solar wind. So Mercury reflects a small percentage of the sunlight that strikes it.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A wire 6.60 m long with diameter of 2.05 mm has a resistance of 0.0310 Ω.

Alex73 [517]

Answer:

1.551×10^-8 Ωm

Explanation:

Resistivity of a material is expressed as shown;.

Resistivity = RA/l

R is the resistance of the material

A is the cross sectional area

l is the length of the wire.

Given;

R = 0.0310 Ω

A = πd²/4

A = π(2.05×10^-3)²/4

A = 0.000013204255/4

A = 0.00000330106375

A = 3.30×10^-6m

l = 6.60m

Substituting this values into the formula for calculating resistivity.

rho = 0.0310× 3.30×10^-6/6.60

rho = 1.023×10^-7/6.60

rho = 1.551×10^-8 Ωm

Hence the resistivity of the material is 1.551×10^-8 Ωm

6 0

3 years ago

You need to build a prototype with machined parts that withstand a saline corrosive environment and temperatures above 200 degre

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Stainless steel

Explanation:

I will try to order the solutions from the least correct to the most correct.

Since a temperature greater than 200 ° F is required, that is to say approximately 93 ° c, Polycaprolactone is the least indicated. Its melting point is approximately 60 ° C, so it would not serve the required application.

On the other hand we have Untreated aluminum, which although it has a melting point higher than the required one, without a zinc and magnesium treatment it will easily oxidize in a salty environment, so it cannot be used in this choice either.

We have to compare the two steels.

The Mild Steel has a better corrosion resistance than the previous ones, but in a long-term cycle it will end up full of corrosion and therefore its properties will be highly affected.

Finally, we have stainless steel, which, as the name implies, contains in some of its variations chromium, zinc or magnesium in its alloys, which makes it highly resistant to corrosion.

In addition its melting point is above 1500 ° c.

The best choice is stainless steel.

5 0

3 years ago

Why is the picture above not an accurate representation of charges and their field lines?

pochemuha

Because field lines don’t all go in to the pole. The bottom half go outwards not inwards.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers