Answer:
D
Explanation:
A) is not correct, because the gravitation potential energy will depend on the height the block is located at. It will be calculated with the formula:
U=mgh.
If we take the ground as a zero height reference, then on point 2 the potential energy will be:


While on point 3, the potential energy will be greater.


B) is not the right answer because the kinetic energy will vary with the height the block is located at in the fact that the energy is conserved (this is if we don't take friction into account or air resistance) so in this case:

We already know the potential energy at point 2. We can calculate the kinetic energy at point 3 like this:



So the kinetic energy at point 2 is given by the equation:

so:


As you may see the kinetic energy at point 2 is greater than the kinetic energy at point 3.
C) Is not correct because according to the first law of thermodinamics, energy is not lost, only transformed. So, since we are not taking into account friction or any other kind of loss, then we can say that the amount of mechanical energy at point 1 is exactly the same as the mechanical energy at point 3.
D) Because of what we talked about on part C, this will be the true situation, because the mechanical energy of the block will be the same no matter theh point you measure it at.
Metals contain the most and semiconductors contain the least amount. Hope this helps.
It’s due to the refraction of light rays as they traverse the boundary between water and air. The greater the viewing angle, the more the bending of the light and therefore the less the apparent depth. An object placed in a denser medium, when viewed from rarer medium appears to be at a lesser depth than its real depth due to refraction of light.
E = hf
E = 6.63* 10 ⁻³⁴ * 7.24* 10¹⁴
<span>E = 4.80012 × 10⁻¹⁹ J</span>
The satellite with more mass will definitely have a higher speed. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. Although the satellite having more mass should have a larger mass difference to have a noticeable speed change. Otherwise it would be hard to detect the speed change. Also we know that
orbit speed = proportional to square root[(Mass of Earth + Mass of Satellite)/orbit radius]. This explains the answer. <span />