You're not going to like this answer, but it's the only one possible:. It wasn't I who learned anything in this unit. If it was either of us, it was YOU. I can't even tell from reading the question what the topic of the unit was. Was it pamphlets ? Microsoft Publisher ? Freshmen ? Getting Through High School ? This is a lot like asking me to write something "in your own words".
A psychologist who would claim that a client's personal experience and viewpoint influence behavior more than events in reality would probably use cognitive psychology mixed with developmental aspects to explain the behavior and personality of a person.
Answer:
176.58 m
Explanation:
t = Time taken = 6 seconds
u = Initial velocity = 0
v = Final velocity
s = Displacement
g = Acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s² = a
Equation of motion
The object travels 176.58 m from the cliff in 6 seconds.
If I remember correctly (from my studies long time ago) the layers are from the outer to the center:
SiAl : Silicon-Aluminum
SiMa : Silicon-Magnesium (although should be Mg)
NiFe : Nickel-Iron
The SiMa layer should have the lightest elements (Magnesium is lighter than Aluminum)
There's no such thing as "stationary in space". But if the distance
between the Earth and some stars is not changing, then (A) w<span>avelengths
measured here would match the actual wavelengths emitted from these
stars. </span><span>
</span><span>If a star is moving toward us in space, then (A) Wavelengths measured
would be shorter than the actual wavelengths emitted from that star.
</span>In order to decide what's actually happening, and how that star is moving,
the trick is: How do we know the actual wavelengths the star emitted ?
