Answer:
0.024 m = 24.07 mm
Explanation:
1) Notation
= tensile stress = 200 Mpa
= plane strain fracture toughness= 55 Mpa
= length of a surface crack (Variable of interest)
2) Definition and Formulas
The Tensile strength is the ability of a material to withstand a pulling force. It is customarily measured in units (F/A), like the pressure. Is an important concept in engineering, especially in the fields of materials and structural engineering.
By definition we have the following formula for the tensile stress:
(1)
We are interested on the minimum length of a surface that will lead to a fracture, so we need to solve for
Multiplying both sides of equation (1) by 
(2)
Sequaring both sides of equation (2):
(3)
Dividing both sides by 
we got:
![\lambda=\frac{1}{\pi}[\frac{K}{Y\sigma_c}]^2](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Clambda%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cpi%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7BK%7D%7BY%5Csigma_c%7D%5D%5E2)
(4)
Replacing the values into equation (4) we got:
![\lambda=\frac{1}{\pi}[\frac{55 Mpa\sqrt{m}}{1.0(200Mpa)}]^2 =0.02407m](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Clambda%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Cpi%7D%5B%5Cfrac%7B55%20Mpa%5Csqrt%7Bm%7D%7D%7B1.0%28200Mpa%29%7D%5D%5E2%20%3D0.02407m)
3) Final solution
So the minimum length of a surface crack that will lead to fracture, would be 24.07 mm or more.
They all share the way that they are fundamentally designed: if they are quite complex, they will share the same basic logic foundations, like the way that the programming languages work. They also all share the method of construction and common and fundamental electronic components, like resistors, capacitors and transistors. As we humans design them, they make logical sense to at least someone, and probably only discounting the internet, you can probably draw logic diagrams and whatever to represent how they work.
Because they are designed by Humans, in a way they all mimic how our brains and society work. Also, as yet there are no truly intelligent technological systems, and are only able to react to a situation how they have been programmed to do so.
Answer:
The question is explained in detailed way in explanation section and in attached files.
Explanation:
The HIPAA Security Rule is designed to be flexible and appropriate for our organization’s particular size, structure, and inherent risks to business and personal information. Risk analysis is meant to be an ongoing process, during which we regularly review our records to track access to business and personal systems and data. With this in mind, I recommend that we expand our information security strategy to include more than just what is required in HIPAA. Just as a reminder below is the HIPAA ecompliance and implementation strategy that we came up with last week as given in attached file 1.
There are several areas in IT security that the above is incomplete or insufficient in. We recommend implementing several more complete or alternative controls in order to protect our systems, patients, employees, contractors, vendors, and assets beyond the HIPAA minimum requirements. The below section describes what the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recommend as additional areas to focus on in the effort to increase an organization's security. (See the attached file # example of some of the areas that we should monitor beyond what HIPAA requires are given in attached file # 03.
Answer:
2.77mpa
Explanation:
compressive strength = 20 MPa. We are to find the estimated flexure strength
We calculate the estimated flexural strength R as
R = 0.62√fc
Where fc is the compressive strength and it is in Mpa
When we substitute 20 for gc
Flexure strength is
0.62x√20
= 0.62x4.472
= 2.77Mpa
The estimated flexure strength is therefore 2.77Mpa
