Answer:
the welding gun liner regulates the shielding gas.
Explanation:
The purpose of the welding gun liner is to properly position the welding wire from the wire feeder till it gets to the nozzle or contact tip of the gun. <em>Regulation of the shielding gas depends on factors such as the speed, current, and type of gas being used. </em>In gas metal arc welding, an electric arc is used to generate heat which melts both the electrode and the workpiece or base metal.
The electric arc produced is shielded from contamination by the shielding gas. The heat generated by the short electric arc is low.
Answer:
Artefacts can influence our actions in several ways. They can be instruments, enabling and facilitating actions, where their presence affects the number and quality of the options for action available to us. They can also influence our actions in a morally more salient way, where their presence changes the likelihood that we will actually perform certain actions. Both kinds of influences are closely related, yet accounts of how they work have been developed largely independently, within different conceptual frameworks and for different purposes. In this paper I account for both kinds of influences within a single framework. Specifically, I develop a descriptive account of how the presence of artefacts affects what we actually do, which is based on a framework commonly used for normative investigations into how the presence of artefacts affects what we can do. This account describes the influence of artefacts on what we actually do in terms of the way facts about those artefacts alter our reasons for action. In developing this account, I will build on Dancy’s (2000a) account of practical reasoning. I will compare my account with two alternatives, those of Latour and Verbeek, and show how my account suggests a specification of their respective key concepts of prescription and invitation. Furthermore, I argue that my account helps us in analysing why the presence of artefacts sometimes fails to influence our actions, contrary to designer expectations or intentions.
When it comes to affecting human actions, it seems artefacts can play two roles. In their first role they can enable or facilitate human actions. Here, the presence of artefacts changes the number and quality of the options for action available to us.Footnote1 For example, their presence makes it possible for us to do things that we would not otherwise be able to do, and thereby adopt new goals, or helps us to do things we would otherwise be able to do, but in more time, with greater effort, etc
Explanation:
Technological artifacts are in general characterized narrowly as material objects made by (human) agents as means to achieve practical ends. ... Unintended by-products of making (e.g. sawdust) or of experiments (e.g. false positives in medical diagnostic tests) are not artifacts for Hilpinen.
Answer: hello some aspects of your question is missing below is the missing information
The gas tank is made from A-36 steel and has an inner diameter of 1.50 m.
answer:
≈ 22.5 mm
Explanation:
Given data:
Inner diameter = 1.5 m
pressure = 5 MPa
factor of safety = 1.5
<u>Calculate the required minimum wall thickness</u>
maximum-shear-stress theory ( σ allow ) = σγ / FS
= 250(10)^6 / 1.5 = 166.67 (10^6) Pa
given that |σ| = σ allow
3.75 (10^6) / t = 166.67 (10^6)
∴ t ( wall thickness ) = 0.0225 m ≈ 22.5 mm
Answer:
Cyclical
Explanation:
I looked at the next question on edgenuity and it said it in the question.
Answer:
The magnitude of the load can be computed because it is mandatory in order to produce the change in length ( elongation )
Explanation:
Yield strength = 275 Mpa
Tensile strength = 380 Mpa
elastic modulus = 103 GPa
The magnitude of the load can be computed because it is mandatory in order to produce the change in length ( elongation ) .
Given that the yield strength, elastic modulus and strain that is experienced by the test spectrum are given
strain = yield strength / elastic modulus
= 0.0027