Answer:
Quantity of charge = 80 Coulombs
Explanation:
Given the following data;
Current = 2 A
Time = 40 seconds
To find the amount of charge flowing through the light bulb;
Mathematically, the quantity of charge passing through a conductor is given by the formula;
Quantity of charge = current * time
Substituting into the formula, we have;
Quantity of charge = 2 * 40
Quantity of charge = 80 Coulombs
Linear momentum is in a straight line and depends on the objects mass and velocity.
Angular (rotational) momentum depends on the objects mass, velocity, and radius.
The spider will cross the driveway <u>25.71 in seconds</u>.
Why?
It's a conversion problem, so, in order to solve it, we need to convert the units of the given information.
Let's convert the given speed (in cm/s) to m/s.
We know that:
So, converting we have:
Then, calculating the time, we have:
We have that the spider will cross the driveway in 25.71 seconds.
Have a nice day!
Increase in height can cause climber's gravitational potential energy greater than any other mean
Hope this helps!
Answer:
the reason for the acceleration month that the coefficient of kinetic friction is less than the coefficient of satic frictionExplanation:
This exercise uses Newton's second law with the condition that the acceleration is zero, by the time the body begins to slide. At this point the balance of forces is
fr- w || = 0
The expression for friction force is that it is proportional to the coefficient of friction by normal.
fr = μ N
When the system is immobile, the coefficient of friction is called static coefficient and has a value, this is due to the union between the surface, when the movement begins some joints are broken giving rise to coefficient of kinetic friction less than static.
In consequence a lower friction force, which is why the system comes out of balance and begins to accelerate.
μ kinetic <μ static
In all this movement the normal with changed that the angle of the table remains fixed.
Consequently, the reason for the acceleration month that the coefficient of kinetic friction is less than the coefficient of satic friction
