The answer is a matter of opinion, and you're going to get different answers
from different people. Here's <u>my</u> take on it:
The writers, producers and advertising sponsors of these shows certainly
don't think they're boring. And <em><u>definitely</u></em> neither do the TV networks that
decide which ones to broadcast.
I'm not trying to say "The experts don't think they're boring, so you must
be wrong". I'm trying to say that different people have different opinions
about the same shows, and in <em>your</em> case,<em> you</em> find them boring.
My conclusion is this:
I think you're finding TV shows boring nowadays because you're growing
as a person. You've grown, developed, and matured to the point where
you're above the level of audience that the shows are pitched for. That's
a very good thing !
You're sad because you used to get pleasure and entertainment from TV,
and now it doesn't give you those things. That's like losing an old friend,
that you used to have such fun playing with, but he just doesn't do it for
you any more.
Now that you've grown up, you've made new friends. With them, you do
things that you wouldn't even understand with your younger friends. And
you develop new interests, like ... I don't know ... books, movies, hobbies,
your church, your profession, learning new things, developing new skills,
exercising your brain, writing, volunteer work, ham radio, building fine
furniture, singing, learning to write music, raising tropical plants, sculpture,
politics ... whatever turns you on. Some people never grow past the stage
where staring at the tube is all they need in life, because they don't have
what it takes to be interested in anything else. Those are the people that
TV is aimed at. But you have more, and that's why TV isn't enough for you.
There are other possible reasons why TV bores you. But until I know more
about you, I think it's a very, very good sign.
Answer:
Waves with high frequencies have shorter wavelengths that work better than low frequency waves for successful echolocation.
Explanation:
To understand why high-frequency waves work better than low frequency waves for successful echolocation, first we have to understand the relation between frequency and wavelength.
The relation between frequency and wavelength is given by
λ = c/f
Where λ is wavelength, c is the speed of light and f is the frequency.
Since the speed of light is constant, the wavelength and frequency are inversely related.
So that means high frequency waves have shorter wavelengths, which is the very reason for the successful echolocation because waves having shorter wavelength are more likely to reach and hit the target and then reflect back to the dolphin to form an image of the object.
Thus, waves with high frequencies have shorter wavelengths that work better than low frequency waves for successful echolocation.
Answer:
acceleration, a = 9.8 m/s²
Explanation:
'A ball is dropped from the top of a building' indicates that the initial velocity of the ball is zero.
u = 0 m/s
After 2 seconds, velocity of the ball is 19.6 m/s.
t = 2s, v = 19.6 m/s
Using
v = u + at
19.6 = 0 + 2a
a = 9.8 m/s²
Answer:
The gravitational acceleration of the planet is, g = 8 m/s²
Explanation:
Given data,
The distance the object falls, s = 144 m
The time taken by the object is, t = 6 s
Using the III equations of motion
S = ut + ½ gt²
∴ g = 2S/t²
Substituting the given values,
g = 2 x 144 /6²
= 8 m/s²
Hence, the gravitational acceleration of the planet is, g = 8 m/s²
If it's Kepler's law of equal areas you're talking about,
then the first of the four statements is true.
