Visual representation of covalent bonding indicating the valence shell electrons in the molecule, lines represents the shared pair of electron and pair of electrons that are not involved in bonding are represented as dots(lone pairs) are known as Lewis structures.
Compound formation takes place in order to complete the octet of each element that is according to octet rule, each atom forms bond with other atom in order to complete their octet that is to get eight electrons in its valence shell and attain stability.
An organic compound of the form 
is known as ketene.
The given ketene is 
.
The number of valence electron of:
The number of valence electrons in = 
2 electrons are involved in each single bond between carbon and hydrogen and 4 electrons are involved in each double bond formed between carbon-carbon and carbon-oxygen. Hence, the total number of electrons involved in bond formation are 12 and rest 2 pair of electrons are present on oxygen as lone pair of electrons.
Therefore, the attached image is the Lewis structure of .
Answer:
<u>2-chlorohexane</u>
Explanation:
<u>In this figure</u> :
- There are 6 carbon atoms
- The Cl atom is bonded to the 2nd carbon atom
⇒ The Cl is a substituent group, termed as -chloro
⇒ Based on IUPAC nomenclature, the 6 atom chain starts with hex
⇒ There are only single bonds present, so it is an alkane
<u>The name is</u> :
Answer:
The day I was in the shower and I will be there at remove the day I was in the shower and I will be there at remove the day to see if you have any questions please feel free to contacts and the day I was in the shower and I will be there at remove the day I was in the shower and I will be there at remove the days of the week are you
When two atoms of the same element are covalently bonded, the radius of each atom will be half the distance between the two nuclei because they equally attract the electrons. The reason for this trend is that the bigger the radii, the further the distance between the two nuclei. Hope this helps:)
After a good long amount of research, I found that the scientific answer to this question would be a big ol’ dink
