Answer: D
Explanation:
When an object falls gravity is pulling down on it and is picking up speed, but as it gains speed air resistance becomes a faster. Air resistance increases with speed. And that force keeps it from accelerating eventually the object will pick up speed such that the force due to air resistance will keep it from getting any more speed at that point force due to air resistance is equal to its weight (mg) and the net force is equal to zero so it won’t accelerate any more at that point it is said to be moving in terminal velocity.
When an object has reached terminal velocity, it will have a constant velocity
Answer:
F = 0.78[N]
Explanation:
The given values correspond to forces, we must remember or take into account that the forces are vector quantities, that is, they have magnitude and direction. Since we have two X-Y coordinate axes (two-dimensional), we are going to decompose each of the forces into the X & y components.
<u>For F₁</u>
<u />![F_{y}=2[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7By%7D%3D2%5BN%5D)
<u />
<u>For F₂</u>
![F_{x}=2*cos(60)\\F_{x}=1[N]\\F_{y}=-2*sin(60)\\F_{y}=-1.73[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7Bx%7D%3D2%2Acos%2860%29%5C%5CF_%7Bx%7D%3D1%5BN%5D%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D-2%2Asin%2860%29%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D-1.73%5BN%5D)
<u>For F₃</u>
<u />![F_{x}=-1*sin(60)\\F_{x}=-0.866[N]\\F_{y}=1*cos(60)\\F_{y}=0.5 [N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7Bx%7D%3D-1%2Asin%2860%29%5C%5CF_%7Bx%7D%3D-0.866%5BN%5D%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D1%2Acos%2860%29%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D0.5%20%5BN%5D)
<u />
Now we can sum each one of the forces in the given axes:
![F_{x}=1-0.866=0.134[N]\\F_{y}=2-1.73+0.5\\F_{y}=0.77[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F_%7Bx%7D%3D1-0.866%3D0.134%5BN%5D%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D2-1.73%2B0.5%5C%5CF_%7By%7D%3D0.77%5BN%5D)
Now using the Pythagorean theorem we can find the total force.
![F=\sqrt{(0.134)^{2} +(0.77)^{2}}\\F= 0.78[N]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=F%3D%5Csqrt%7B%280.134%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%280.77%29%5E%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5CF%3D%200.78%5BN%5D)
Multiply 25 * 8 = 200
So the cheetah has gone 200 miles in 25 seconds
Answer:
d = 1.954 Km
Explanation:
given,
total distance, D = 2.5 Km
in stretch A to B =
speed = 99 Km/h = 99 x 0.278 = 27.22 m/s time =t
in stretch B to C
time = 3.4 s
In stretch C to D
speed = 48 Km/h = 48 x 0.278 = 13.34 m/s time =t
we know,
distance = speed x time
distance of BC
using equation of motion
v = u + a t
27.22 = 13.34 - a x 3.4
a = 4.08 m/s²
uniform deceleration is equal to 4.08 m/s²
distance traveled in BC
s = 68.94 m
3000 = 27.5 t + 68.94 + 13.33 t
40.83 t = 2931.06
t = 71.79 s
distance travel in AB
distance = s x t
d = 27.22 x 71.79
d = 1954 m
d = 1.954 Km
distance between A and B is equal to 1.954 Km.
After one meter, 3.4% of the light is gone ... either soaked up in the fiber
material or escaped from it. So only (100 - 3.4) = 96.6% of the light
remains, to go on to the next meter.
After the second meter, 96.6% of what entered it emerges from it, and
that's 96.6% of 96.6% of the original signal that entered the beginning
of the fiber.
==> After 2 meters, the intensity has dwindled to (0.966)² of its original level.
It's that exponent of ' 2 ' that corresponds to the number of meters that the light
has traveled through.
==> After 'x' meters of fiber, the remaininglight intensity is (0.966) ^x-power
of its original value.
If you shine 1,500 lumens into the front of the fiber, then after 'x' meters of
cable, you'll have
<em>(1,500) · (0.966)^x</em>
lumens of light remaining.
=========================================
The genius engineers in the fiber design industry would not handle it this way.
When they look up the 'attenuation' of the cable in the fiber manufacturer's
catalog, it would say "15dB per 100 meters".
What does that mean ? Break it down: 15dB in 100 meters is <u>0.15dB per meter</u>.
Now, watch this:
Up at the top, the problem told us that the loss in 1 meter is 3.4% . We applied
super high mathematics to that and calculated that 96.6% remains, or 0.966.
Look at this ==> 10 log(0.966) = <em><u>-0.15</u> </em> <== loss per meter, in dB .
Armed with this information, the engineer ... calculating the loss in 'x' meters of
fiber cable, doesn't have to mess with raising numbers to powers. All he has to
do is say ...
-- 0.15 dB loss per meter
-- 'x' meters of cable
-- 0.15x dB of loss.
If 'x' happens to be, say, 72 meters, then the loss is (72) (0.15) = 10.8 dB .
and 10 ^ (-10.8/10) = 10 ^ -1.08 = 0.083 = <em>8.3%</em> <== <u>That's</u> how much light
he'll have left after 72 meters, and all he had to do was a simple multiplication.
Sorry. Didn't mean to ramble on. But I do stuff like this every day.
