Answer:
yeah I'm Pretty sure it's b
As the magnet is moved inside a coil of wire, the number of lines of magnetic field passing through the coil changes. Faraday stated that : it is the change in the number of field lines passing through the the coil of wire that induces emf in the loop. Specifically, it is the rate of change in the number of magnetic field lines passing through the loop that determines the induced emf. There is a term called magnetic flux same as electric flux, this magnetic flux can be a measure of the number of field lines passing through a surface. It is given by ( Φ=ΣB. dA. Where B is magnetic field and dA is small elementary area). The induced emf is given by (ξ = dΦ/dt). This equation states that THE MAGNITUDE OF THE INDUCED CURRENT IN A CIRCUIT IS EQUAL TO THE RATE AT WHICH THE MAGNETIC FLUX THROUGH THE CIRCUIT IS CHANGING WITH TIME. So more rapid you move the coil, more will be the change in flux and hence more emf will be produced. So option D is the correct answer. I hope this long description will help you out.
ANSWER
EXPLANATION
Parameters given:
Mass of car, mc = 1103 kg
Mass of truck, mt = 4919 kg
Initial velocity of car, uc = 18 m/s
Inital velocity of truck = 0 m/s
To solve this problem, we have to apply the law of conservation of momentum, which states that the total momentum of a system is constant.
This implies that:
Since the car and the truck stick together after the collision, they will have the same final velocity.
Hence:
Substitute the given values and solve for v (final velocity):
That is the final velocity of the two-vehicle mass.
Answer:
The frictional force 
6.446 N
The acceleration of the block a = 6.04 
Explanation:
Mass of the block = 3.9 kg
°
= 0.22
(a). The frictional force is given by
3.9 × 9.81 × 
29.3 N
Therefore the frictional force
0.22 × 29.3
6.446 N
(b). Block acceleration is given by
F = 30 N
= 6.446 N
= 30 - 6.446
= 23.554 N
The net force acting on the block is given by
23.554 = 3.9 × a
a = 6.04
This is the acceleration of the block.
Stark contrast to paths on energy surfaces or even mechanistic reactions, rule-based and inductive computational approaches to reaction prediction mostly consider only overall transformations. Overall transformations are general molecular graph rearrangements reflecting only the net change of several successive mechanistic reactions. For example, Figure 1 shows the overall transformation of an alkene interacting with hydrobromic acid to yield the alkyl bromide along with the two elementary reactions which compose the transformation.
