Enormous O unpredictability is in reference to the most exceedingly terrible conceivable development rate of the calculation. So O(N log N) implies that it will never keep running in some time more terrible than O(N log N). So in spite of the fact that Al's calculation scales superior to Bob's quadratic algo, it doesn't really mean it is better for ALL info sizes.
Maybe there is critical overhead in building up it, for example, making a lot of clusters or factors. Remember that even an O(N log N) calculation could have 1000 non settled circles that official at O(N) and still be viewed as O(N log N) the length of it is the most exceedingly awful part.
Will i thank <span>consists of many volumes
hope this help!!!!!!!!</span>
Properties of a compound is completely different from their elements.
Water is composed by hydrogen and oxygen.
For example, the boiling point of oxygen is - 183 °C and hydrogen is - 253 °C, meanwhile, water has a boiling point of 100°C
Another example is when you put a burning wooden splint into oxygen, it burns more brightly. Put it in hydrogen, you may hear a "pop" sound, or even explode when large amount of hydrogen. But if u put a burning splint in water, it goes off.
M1V1 = M2V2
M1 = 3.000 M
V1 = 0.8000 L
M2 = ?
V2 = 2.00 L
M2 = M1V1/V2 = (3.000 M)(0.8000 L)/(2.00 L) = 1.20 M
Answer:
I say the second one, im not rlly sure tho
Explanation: