This question needs research to be answered. From the given information alone it can't be answered without making wild assumptions.
Ideally, you need to take a look at a distribution (or a histogram) of asteroid diameters, identify the "mode" of such a distribution, and find the corresponding diameter. That value will be the answer.
I am attaching one such histogram on asteroid diameters from the IRAS asteroid catalog I could find online. (In order to get a single histogram, you need to add the individual curves in the figure first). Eyeballing this sample, I'd say the mode is somewhere around 10km, so the answer would be: the diameter of most asteroid from the IRAS asteroid catalog is about 10km.
0.23 mm far apart are the second-order fringes for these two wavelengths on a screen 1.5 m away.
<h3>Given wavelengths 710nm and 660nm,0.65mm apart two slits, and a screen 1.5m away.</h3>
Position of n the order fringe = n λ D / d
for n = 2
position = 2 λ D / d
λ = 710 nm , D = 1.5m
d = .65 x 10⁻³
position 1 = 2 x 710 x 10⁻⁹ x 1.5 / .65 x 10⁻³
= 3276.92 x 10⁻⁶ m
= 3.276x 10⁻³ m
= 3.276mm .
For λ = 660 nm
position = 2 λ D / d
λ = 660 nm , D = 1.5 m
d = .65 x 10⁻³
position 2 = 2 x 660 x 10⁻⁹ x 1.5 / .65 x 10⁻³
= 3046.15 x 10⁻⁶ m
= 3.046 x 10⁻³ m
= 3.046 mm .
Difference between their position
= 3.276mm ₋ 3.046 mm
= 0.23 mm .
To know more about Fringes refer to: brainly.com/question/15649748
#SPJ4
For radio broadcasting, in electricity meters, in any generator.
Answer:
wen I was in the car toing home from school after a bad day n si si I have crazzyyy
Answer:
i. The error is the rough convex mirror.
ii. This should be replaced with a smooth convex morror.
Explanation:
Reflection is dependent on the surface involved and has two types; diffuse and specular. When the surface is rough, diffused reflection is observed. The surface causes a distortion of the incident light (the rays would be reflected at different angles to one another) after reflection. This makes some rays to interfere with one another. While specular reflection is observed with a smooth surface.
In the statement, the rough convex mirror would produce a distorted reflection which would produce diffused reflection. The effect is that few or no rays (depending on the degree of how rough the surfce is) would be reflected to the other smooth, flat diagonal mirror.
