Momentum is a product mass and velocity. If a certain object posses a kinetic energy, then it should have a momentum since it is moving which has a velocity. However, if the object is at rest and only has potential energy, then it would not have momentum. So, for the first question the answer would be yes, an object can have energy without having any momentum. For the second question, every object whether it is moving or at rest, possess some energy, potential for an object at rest and kinetic for an object that is moving. Thus, the answer would be no, an object having momentum would always have energy.
<u>Option b. </u>A smaller magnitude of momentum and more kinetic energy.
<h3>What is a momentum?</h3>
- In Newtonian physics, an object's linear momentum, translational momentum, or simply momentum is defined as the product of its mass and velocity.
- It has both a magnitude and a direction, making it a vector quantity. The object's momentum, p, is defined as: p=mv if m is the object's mass and v is its velocity (also a vector quantity).
- The kilogram metre per second (kg m/s), or newton-second in the International System of Units (SI), is the unit used to measure momentum.
- The rate of change of a body's momentum is equal to the net force exerted on it, according to Newton's second law of motion.
To know more about momentum, refer:
brainly.com/question/1042017
#SPJ4
(3) The frictional force exerted by the floor on the box
If the machine is 100% efficient, then its
Mechanical Advantage is (450/50) = 9 .
If the machine is less than 100% efficient,
then the MA is more than 9 .
Two major scientific discoveries provide strong support for the Big Bang theory: • Hubble's discovery in the 1920s of a relationship between a galaxy's distance from Earth and its speed; and • the discovery in the 1960s of cosmic microwave background radiation. Please give brainliest