The sample with the largest number of oxygen atoms will be calcium perchlorate.
<h3>Number of atoms in a compound</h3>
Since we are not looking at the number of moles, the mass of the compounds has no bearing on the number of atoms of oxygen.
- The chemical formula for carbon dioxide is
. Thus, it has 2 atoms of oxygen. - The chemical formula for potassium chlorate is
. Thus, it has 3 oxygen atoms. - The chemical formula for calcium perchlorate is
. Thus, it has 8 atoms of oxygen. - The chemical formula for sodium hydroxide is NaOH. Thus, it has 1 atom of oxygen.
Therefore, the compound with the largest number of oxygen atoms is calcium perchlorate.
More on the number of atoms in compounds can be found here: brainly.com/question/1686912
#SPJ1
2-Dimethylcyclohexanol <span>major alkene product is produced by the dehydration of the alcohols.</span>
Answer is: solution of electrolyte will have lower freezing point than solution of nonelectrolyte.
This is because salt solution has more particles in of sodium chloride (sodium and chlorine ions) than in same concentration of glucose. Electrolytes better separates into particles in water because of their ionic bond.<span>
</span>
Work allows energy to be transferred from one object to another. To do work, an agent must exert a force on an object over a long distance.
When work is done, energy is transferred from the agent to the object, resulting in a change in the motion of the object (more specifically, a change in the object's kinetic energy).
What is energy?
Energy is essential to human society and has numerous health benefits. However, each energy source poses some health risks. This article examines the health consequences of each major source of energy, focusing on those with the greatest global impact on disease burden. The harvesting and burning of solid fuels, coal, and biomass have the greatest health consequences, primarily in the form of occupational health risks and household and general ambient air pollution. In the world's poorest households, a lack of access to clean fuels and electricity poses a particularly serious health risk. Although energy efficiency has many advantages, energy use is essential to human society and has numerous health benefits.
To learn more about energy from the given link:
brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ9
Let's think, if you have a candle ( that is not blown out ) the physical properties are the candles mass and hence ( hence of the candle is the stiffness of the candle), weight, length, density, surface friction ( force resisting the relative motion of solid surface), and the energy content. You then, need to go to bed, so, therefore, you want to blow the candle out. Once you blow the candle out, the candle is evidently going to have at least a couple of different physical properties, than before it was blown out. The physical properties are a different color, the length of the candle, the texture, you could also apply the mass of the candleholder, and then, the mass of the candleholder and the candle, last but not least, the mass of just the candle. Once you observe the candle, you should be able to plug in those observations into the physical properties. As to, because you asked' what are the physical properties of a candle that has been blown out... We are going to assume that we did observe the candle, and the length of the candle in cm, after being blown out is 30cm. (12 inches; customary). Next, that the color of the candle is the same (let us say the original color is taffy pink). We can then say that the texture of the candle is waxy and the top and smooth as you get to the bottom ( the texture depends on how long the candle was burning, but we are saying that we lit the candle, and then immediately blew the flame out ) . We now have the mass of the candleholder, which will scientificity stay the same. Now, for the mass of the candleholder and the candle, that all depends of how long you let it burn ( remember, we are saying we lit the wick and then immediately blew the fame out ). So, the candle really didn't change is mass, so, therefore, wouldn't affect the mass of the candleholder including the candle. That also goes to the mass of the candle.
