Answer:
How does non-human life in an urban ecosystem differ from that in an undeveloped forest ecosystem?
Explanation:
In forest eco system the people are uncivilized and not so much educated. And in urban eco system people are intelligent as well as educated this is the main reason. In an urban ecosystem, the only non-human life that live there are the ones that are able to survive under the conditions. However, in undeveloped forest ecosystems, there’s barely any pollution. Therefore, a bigger variety of non-human life is able to live here.
Mark brainliest if you can please :)
A spectrum that includes all colors and doesn't have
any gaps in it is a continuous spectrum.
is it decomp single replacement double replacement
Answer:
The system is not in equilibrium and will evolve left to right to reach equilibrium.
Explanation:
The reaction quotient Qc is defined for a generic reaction:
aA + bB → cC + dD
![Q=\frac{[C]^{c} *[D]^{d} }{[A]^{a}*[B]^{b} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Q%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BC%5D%5E%7Bc%7D%20%2A%5BD%5D%5E%7Bd%7D%20%7D%7B%5BA%5D%5E%7Ba%7D%2A%5BB%5D%5E%7Bb%7D%20%20%7D)
where the concentrations are not those of equilibrium, but other given concentrations
Chemical Equilibrium is the state in which the direct and indirect reaction have the same speed and is represented by a constant Kc, which for a generic reaction as shown above, is defined:
![Kc=\frac{[C]^{c} *[D]^{d} }{[A]^{a}*[B]^{b} }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Kc%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BC%5D%5E%7Bc%7D%20%2A%5BD%5D%5E%7Bd%7D%20%7D%7B%5BA%5D%5E%7Ba%7D%2A%5BB%5D%5E%7Bb%7D%20%20%7D)
where the concentrations are those of equilibrium.
This constant is equal to the multiplication of the concentrations of the products raised to their stoichiometric coefficients divided by the multiplication of the concentrations of the reactants also raised to their stoichiometric coefficients.
Comparing Qc with Kc allows to find out the status and evolution of the system:
- If the reaction quotient is equal to the equilibrium constant, Qc = Kc, the system has reached chemical equilibrium.
- If the reaction quotient is greater than the equilibrium constant, Qc> Kc, the system is not in equilibrium. In this case the direct reaction predominates and there will be more product present than what is obtained at equilibrium. Therefore, this product is used to promote the reverse reaction and reach equilibrium. The system will then evolve to the left to increase the reagent concentration.
- If the reaction quotient is less than the equilibrium constant, Qc <Kc, the system is not in equilibrium. The concentration of the reagents is higher than it would be at equilibrium, so the direct reaction predominates. Thus, the system will evolve to the right to increase the concentration of products.
In this case:
![Q=\frac{[So_{3}] ^{2} }{[SO_{2} ]^{2}* [O_{2}] }](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Q%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BSo_%7B3%7D%5D%20%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%7B%5BSO_%7B2%7D%20%5D%5E%7B2%7D%2A%20%5BO_%7B2%7D%5D%20%7D)

Q=100,000
100,000 < 4,300,000 (4.3*10⁶)
Q < Kc
<u><em>
The system is not in equilibrium and will evolve left to right to reach equilibrium.</em></u>
False
Although we use many of their ideas to describe atoms today, such as the existence of a tiny, dense nucleus in an atom (proposed by Rutherford), or the notion that all atoms of an element are identical (proposed by Dalton), some of their ideas have been rejected by the modern theory of the atom.
For example, Thompson came up with the plum pudding model to describe an atom, which resembled a sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it. We know now, however, that atoms are mostly empty space with a tiny, dense nucleus.
Another example is Dalton's atomic theory, which stated that atoms are indivisible particles. However, this was disproved by the discovery of subatomic particles.