All categories

3 years ago

Which of the following is a possible unit of ultimate tensile strength?

Engineering

1 answer:

levacccp [35]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Newton per square meter (N/m2)

Explanation:

Required

Unit of ultimate tensile strength

Ultimate tensile strength (U) is calculated using:

$U = \frac{Ultimate\ Force}{Area}$

The units of force is N (Newton) and the unit of Area is m^2

So, we have:

$U = \frac{N}{m^2}$

$U = N/m^2$

<em>Hence: (c) is correct</em>

You might be interested in

Compare the temperature dependence of Nabarro-Herring and Coble creep. Which is more temperature-sensitive

kicyunya [14]

Lower temperatures favor Coble creep and higher temperatures favor Nabbaro–Herring creep because the activation energy for vacancy diffusion within the lattice is typically larger than that along the grain boundaries, thus lattice diffusion slows down relative to grain boundary diffusion with decreasing temperature.

7 0

2 years ago

You are a designer of a new processor. You have to choose between two possible implementations (called M1 and M2) of the same ar

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

A ) CPI : M1 = 2.4 , M2 = 2.65

B ) MIPS : M1 = 1083, M2 = 1056

C ) The machine that has a better performance based on MIPS is M1 and this is by 27 million number of instructions per sec

Explanation:

A) The CPI for each machine

CPI = ( Total number of execution cycles ) / ( instruction counter executed )

For Machine 1 ( M1 )

we have to make some assumptions : number of instructions = 10

number of times A was executed = 4 , Number of times B was executed = 2.5 , number of times C was executed = 2.5, Number of times D was executed = 1. and this was based on the frequency given above

hence CPI for M1 =[ ( 1 * 4 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 5 * 1 ) ] / 10

CPI for M1 = 2.4

For Machine 2 ( M2 )

we have to make some assumptions : number of instructions = 10

number of times A was executed = 4 , Number of times B was executed = 2. number of times C was executed = 1.5, Number of times D was executed = 2.5 times. and this was based on the frequency given above

Hence CPI for M1 = [ ( 2 * 4 ) + ( 2 * 2 ) + ( 3 * 1.5 ) + ( 4 * 2.5 ) ] / 10

CPI for M2 = 2.65

B ) Calculate the native MIPS ratings for M1 and M2

MIPS = ( instruction counts ) / ( Execution time * 10^6 )

For M1

Assumptions : number of instructions executed = 10

each clock cycle = 0.3846 * 10^-9. frequency = 2.6 Ghz

first we calculate the total execution time which is equal to :

= [ ( 1 * 4 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 5 * 1 ) ] * 0.3846 * 10 ^-9

= 9.2304 * 10 ^-9 secs

therefore the MIPS for M1

= 10 / ( 9.2304 * 10^-9 ) * 10^6 = 1083

For M2

Assumptions : number of instructions executed = 10

each clock cycle = 0.3846 * 10^-9. frequency = 2.8 Ghz

first we calculate the total execution time which is equal to :

= [ (2*4) + (2*2) + (3 * 1.5 ) + ( 4 * 2.5 ) ] * 0.3846 * 10^-9 = 9.4631 * 10^-9 secs

therefor the MIPS for M2

= 10 / ( 9.4631*10^-9) * 10^6 = 1056

C ) The machine that has a better performance based on MIPS is M1 and this is by 27 million number of instructions per sec

8 0

3 years ago

Vending machine controller (adapted from Katz, "Contemporary Logic Design") Design and implement a finite state machine that con

babunello [35]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

A vending machine controller is that type of machine that comes with a single serial port on the same chip as the programmable processor. The controller comprises of a port arbitrator that selectively attaches or links one of a number of serially communicating devices to this single serial port.

Kindly check the attached image to get the step by step explanation to the above question.

6 0

3 years ago

Consider a modification of the air-standard Otto cycle in which the isentropic compression and expansion processes are each repl

Ulleksa [173]

Answer:

The answers to the question are

(1) Process 1 to 2

W = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = -73.79 kJ/kg

(2) Process 2 to 3

W = 0

Q = 1135.376 kJ/kg

(3) Process 3 to 4

W = -1049.835 kJ/kg

Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

(4) Process 4 to 3

W=0

Q = -569.09 kJ/kg

(b) The thermal efficiency = 49.9 %

Explanation:

(a) Volume compression ratio $\frac{v_1}{v_2} = 10$

Initial pressure p₁ = 1 bar

Initial temperature, T₁ = 310 K

cp = 1.005 kJ/kg⋅K

Temperature T₃ = 2200 K from the isentropic chart of the Otto cycle

For a polytropic process we have

$\frac{p_1}{p_2} = (\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^n$ Therefore p₂ = p₁ ÷ $(\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^n$ = (1 bar) ÷ $(\frac{1}{10} )^{1.3}$ = 19.953 bar

Similarly for a polytropic process we have

$\frac{T_1}{T_2} = (\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^{n-1}$ or T₂ = T₁ ÷ $(\frac{v_2}{v_1} )^{n-1}$ = $\frac{310}{0.1^{0.3}}$ = 618.531 K

The molar mass of air is 28.9628 g/mol.

Therefore R = $\frac{8.3145}{28.9628}$ = 0.287 kJ/kg⋅K

cp = 1.005 kJ/kg⋅K Therefore cv = cp - R = 1.005- 0.287 = 0.718 kJ/kg⋅K

1). For process 1 to 2 which is polytropic process we have

W = $\frac{R(T_2-T_1)}{n-1}$ = $\frac{0.287(618.531-310)}{1.3 - 1}$ = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = $(\frac{n-\gamma}{\gamma - 1} )W$ = $(\frac{1.3-1.4}{1.4-1} ) 295.16 kJ/kg$ = -73.79 kJ/kg

W = 295.16 kJ/kg

Q = -73.79 kJ/kg

2). For process 2 to 3 which is reversible constant volume heating we have

W = 0 and Q = cv×(T₃ - T₂) = 0.718× (2200-618.531) = 1135.376 kJ/kg

W = 0

Q = 1135.376 kJ/kg

3). For process 3 to 4 which is polytropic process we have

W = $\frac{R(T_4-T_3)}{n-1}$ = Where T₄ is given by $\frac{T_4}{T_3} = (\frac{v_3}{v_4} )^{n-1}$ or T₄ = T₃ × $0.1^{0.3}$

= 2200 × $0.1^{0.3}$ T₄ = 1102.611 K

W = $\frac{0.287(1102.611-2200)}{1.3 - 1}$ = -1049.835 kJ/kg

and Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

W = -1049.835 kJ/kg

Q = 262.459 kJ/kg

4). For process 4 to 1 which is reversible constant volume cooling we have

W = 0 and Q = cv×(T₁ - T₄) = 0.718×(310 - 1102.611) = -569.09 kJ/kg

W=0

Q = -569.09 kJ/kg

(b) The thermal efficiency is given by

$\eta = 1-\frac{T_4-T_1}{T_3-T_2}$ = $1-\frac{1102.611-310}{2200-618.531}$ = 0.499 or 49.9 % Efficient

$p_{m} = \frac{p_1r[(r^{n-1}-1)(r_p-1)]}{ (n-1)(r-1)}$ where r = compression ratio and $r_p$ = $\frac{p_3}{p_2}$

However p₃ = $\frac{p_2T_3}{T_2}$ = $\frac{(19.953)(2200)}{618.531}$ =70.97 atm

$r_p$ = $\frac{p_3}{p_2}$ = $\frac{70.97}{19.953} = 3.56$

Therefore $p_m =\frac{1*10*[(10^{0.3}-1)(3.56-1)]}{0.3*9}$ = 9.44 bar

Please find attached generalized diagrams of the Otto cycle

8 0

3 years ago

Select the correct text in the passage.

sineoko [7]

It is habahi Yw with yuuuuuy I am a little more confused about

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers