- The data for the first part of the experiment support the first hypothesis.
- As the force applied to the cart increased, the acceleration of the cart increased.
- Since the increase in the applied force caused the increase in the cart's acceleration, force and acceleration are directly proportional to each other, which is in accordance with Newton's second law.
When we state something about the results on the basis whether the observed data supports the original hypothesis, we say that we are concluding the results.
What is the relationship between force and acceleration based on Newton's 2nd law?
Newton's second law of motion can be formally stated as follows: The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
Learn more about Newton's second law of motion brainly.com/question/13447525
#SPJ4
Answer:
61.33 Kg
Explanation:
From the question given above, the following data were obtained:
Distance = 1×10² m
Time = 9.5 s
Kinetic energy (KE) = 3.40×10³ J
Mass (m) =?
Next, we shall determine the velocity Leroy Burrell. This can be obtained as follow:
Distance = 1×10² m
Time = 9.5 s
Velocity =?
Velocity = Distance / time
Velocity = 1×10² / 9.5
Velocity = 10.53 m/s
Finally, we shall determine the mass of Leroy Burrell. This can be obtained as follow:
Kinetic energy (KE) = 3.40×10³ J
Velocity (v) = 10.53 m/s
Mass (m) =?
KE = ½mv²
3.40×10³ = ½ × m × 10.53²
3.40×10³ = ½ × m × 110.8809
3.40×10³ = m × 55.44045
Divide both side by 55.44045
m = 3.40×10³ / 55.44045
m = 61.33 Kg
Thus, the mass of Leroy Burrell is 61.33 Kg
Answer:
Explanation:
The two triangles are similar what is the length of DE
There is no factor on your list of choices that has any effect.
This is another one of those muddy misleading questions, followed by
a muddy group of choices from which an answer must be selected.
a). is absurd. There's no such thing as a "balanced force", only
a balanced group of forces.
b). is probably the choice the question is aiming for.
c). is not so. The engines of an airplane do plenty of work lifting the plane
off the ground, although the force of the engines is never directed upward.
d). is really awkward. The object's motion is almost never the cause of the force.
The force is almost always the cause of the object's motion.
Now for the big 800-lb gorilla in the room: No moving object needs to be involved
in order for energy to be flowing or work to be getting done.
-- A radio wave radiates through space. Straighten out a wire coat-hanger and
stick it up in the air where the radio wave can pass by it. Electrical current flows
through the wire, and you can drain the electrical energy out the bottom of it.
-- A light bulb is shining. Some distance away, something it's shining on
gets warm, because of the heat energy that has shot across to it from the
light bulb and soaked into it.
-- A lightning bolt jumps from the ground to a passing cloud. Or, if you feel
more comfortable with it, a lightning bolt jumps from a cloud to the ground.
It doesn't matter. Either way, there's enough energy splashing around to
ignite houses, zap TVs and computers, melt concrete, vaporize water, and
light up a city. Although nothing is moving.
