It will be extracted only 1/3 of NaCl less in 10 mL of water than in 30 mL of water.
If it is known that solubility of NaCl is 360 g/L, let's find out how many NaCl is in 30 mL of water:
360 g : 1 L = x g : 30 mL
Since 1 L = 1,000 mL, then:
360 g : 1,000 mL = <span>x g : 30 mL
Now, crossing the products:
x </span>· 1,000 mL = 360 g · 30 mL
x · 1,000 mL = 10,800 g mL
x = 10,800 g ÷ 1,000
x = 10.8 g
So, from 30 mL mixture, 10.8 g of NaCl could be extracted.
Let's calculate the same for 10 mL water instead of 30 mL.
360 g : 1 L = x g : 10 mL
Since 1 L = 1,000 mL, then:
360 g : 1,000 mL = <span>x g : 10 mL
Now, crossing the products:
x </span>· 1,000 mL = 360 g · 10 mL
x · 1,000 mL = 3,600 g mL
x = 3,600 g ÷ 1,000
<span>x = 3.6 g
</span>
<span>So, from 10 mL mixture, 3.6 g of NaCl could be extracted.
</span>
Now, let's compare:
If from 30 mL mixture, 10.8 g of NaCl could be extracted and <span>from 10 mL mixture, 3.6 g of NaCl could be extracted, the ratio is:
</span>3.6/10.8 = 1/3
Therefore, i<span>t will be extracted only 1/3 of NaCl less in 10 mL of water than in 30 mL of water. </span>
Answer:
Kp is 0.00177
Explanation:
We state the equilibrium:
CO(g) + Cl₂(g) ⇆ COCl₂(g)
Initially we have these partial pressures
1.86 atm for CO and 1.27 for chlorine.
During the reaction, x pressure has been converted. As we have 0.823 atm as final pressure in the equilibrium for COCl₂, pressure at equilibrium for CO and chlorine will be:
1.86 - x for CO and 1.27 - x for Cl₂.
And x is the pressure generated for the product, because initially we don't have anything from it. So pressure in equilibrium for the reactants will be:
1.86 - 0.823 = 1.037 atm for CO
1.27 - 0.823 = 0.447 atm for Cl₂
Let's make, expression for Kp:
Partial pressure in eq. for COCl₂ / P. pressure in eq. for CO . P pressure in eq. for Cl₂
Kp = 0.823 / (1.037 . 0.447) → 0.00177
The present work addresses the performance of polycaprolactone (PCL) coating on fluoride treated (MgF2) biodegradable ZK60 magnesium alloy (Mg) for biomedical application. MgF2 conversion layer was first produced by immersing Mg alloy substrate in hydrofluoric acid solution. The outer PCL coating was then prepared using dip coating technique. Morphology, elements profile, phase structure, roughness, mechanical properties, invitro corrosion, and biocompatibility of duplex MgF2/PCL coating were then characterized and compared to those of fluoride coated and uncoated Mg samples. The invivo degradation behavior and biocompatibility of duplex MgF2/PCL coating with respect to ZK60 Mg alloy were also studied using rabbit model for 2 weeks. SEM and TEM analysis showed that the duplex coating was uniform and comprised of porous PCL film (~3.3 μm) as upper layer with compact MgF2 (~2.2 μm) as inner layer. No significant change in microhardness was found on duplex coating compared with uncoated ZK60 Mg alloy. The duplex coating showed improved invitro corrosion resistance than single layered MgF2 or uncoated alloy samples. The duplex coating also resulted in better cell viability, cell adhesion, and cell proliferation compared to fluoride coated or uncoated alloy. Preliminary invivo studies indicated that duplex MgF2/PCL coating reduced the degradation rate of ZK60 Mg alloy and exhibited good biocompatibility. These results suggested that duplex MgF2/PCL coating on magnesium alloy might have great potential for orthopedic applications.
Answer:
C. 1.17 grams
Explanation:
- The molarity is the no. of moles of solute in a 1.0 L of the solution.
<em>M = (mass/molar mass)solute x (1000/ V)</em>
M = 0.1 M, mass = ??? g, molar mass of NaCl = 58.44 g/mol, V = 200.0 mL.
∴ mass of NaCl = (M)(molar mass)(V)/1000 = (0.1 M)(58.44 g/mol)(200.0 mL)/1000 = 1.168 g ≅ 1.17 g.
Given :
The distance between a point charge and a neutral atom and is multiplied by a factor of 5.
To Find :
By what factor does the force on the neutral atom by the point charge change.
Solution :
We know, electrostatic force between two object is directly proportional to product of charge and inversely proportional to distance between them.
Now, charge in neutral atom is 0 C.
So, the electrostatic force between two of them is also 0 N.
Therefore, by changing distance between the charge the forces did no change ( it remains zero).
