1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]
3 years ago
13

Given three different locations on Earth's surface, where will the weight of a person be greatest? in New York City, which is ab

out 6369 km from the center of the Earth at the South Pole, which is about 6356 km from the center of the Earth on the Equator line, which is about 6378 km from the center of the Earth the weight is the same at all three locations
Physics
1 answer:
zhenek [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. South Pole.

Explanation:

In order to answer this question, we simply have to refer to the laws of the equations of gravitational mechanics.

The equation given by Newton tells us that

F = \frac {Gm_1m_2} {r^2}

In the case where we compare a specific place where the Force of Gravity is greater or lesser, we focus on the term assigned to the Planet's Radius.

In the case of G, m_1, m_2, we understand that they are constant.

We can easily notice that the more the Radius (Height seen from a viewer on the ground), the lower the force will be.

<em>In other words, the smaller the radius in which the measurement is made with respect to the center of the earth, the greater the gravitational force.</em>

In that order of ideas the smallest radio has South Pole, which is about 6356 km from the center of the Earth on the Equator line

You might be interested in
A forest fire wipes out all of the plant life in an area, causing the animals to leave. The ground becomes a mixture of soil and
algol [13]
I think it might be c but I might be wrong
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your cousin Jannik skis down a blue square ski slope, with an initial speed of 3.6 m/s. He travels 15 m down the mountain side b
fenix001 [56]

Answer: The loss of energy due to friction is equal to 1,253 J.

Explanation:

The problem tells us that the skier has an initial speed of 3.6 m/s, which means that his initial kinetic energy is as follows:

K₁ = 1/2 m v₁² = 1/2 . 58.0 Kg. (3.6)² (m/s)² =  376 J

After coming to a  flat landing, his final speed is 7.8 m/s, so the final kinetic energy is as follows:

K₂ = 1/2 m v₂² = 1/2. 58.0 Kg. (7.8)² (m/s)² = 1,764 J

Now, when skying down the slope the increase in kinetic energy only can come from another type of energy, in this case, gravitational potential energy.

If we take the ground flat level as a Zero reference, the initial gravitational potential energy, can be written as follows, by definition:

U₁ = m.g. h (1)

Now, we don't know the value of the height h, but we know that the incline has a 18º angle above the horizontal, and that the distance travelled along the incline is 15 m.

By definition, the sinus of an angle, is equal to the proportion between the height and the hypotenuse , so we can write the following equation:

sin 18º = h / 15 m ⇒ h = 15 m. sin 18º = 4.6 m

Replacing in (1), we get:

U₁ = 58.0 Kg. 9.8 m/s². 4.6 m = 2,641 J

So, we can get the total initial mechanical energy, as follows:

E₁ = K₁ + U₁ = 376 J + 2,641 J = 3,017 J

After arriving to the flat zone, all potential energy has become in kinetic energy, even though not completely, due to the effect of friction.

This remaining kinetic energy can be written as follows:

E₂ = K₂ = 1,764 J

The difference E₂-E₁, is the loss of energy due to friction forces acting during the travel along the 15 m path, and is as follows:

ΔE= E₂ - E₁ = 1,764 J - 3,017 J = -1,253 J

8 0
3 years ago
As mass increases what happens to the kinetic energy
AnnyKZ [126]
As mass increases kinetic energy also increases; kinetic energy is directly proportional to mass so whatever is done to either affects the other one the same. i hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
Can an ordinary object, like a motorcycle, be mass-less? Yes or No
Drupady [299]

Answer:

no.

Explanation:

because the mass of an object never changes.

4 0
3 years ago
How are weather from ice and plants different from weathering from wind and water?
DENIUS [597]
“Weathering is the breaking down of rocks, soil and minerals as well as wood and artificial materials through contact with the Earth’s atmosphere, biota and waters. Weathering occurs in situ, roughly translated to: “with no movement”, and thus should not be confused with erosion, which involves the movement of rocks and minerals by agents such as water, ice, snow, wind, waves and gravity and then being transported and deposited in other locations.”

Weathering processes are of three main types: mechanical, organic and chemical weathering.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • the gravational force is between two objects 18 N . if the distance between them is tripled and their masses are doubled. then w
    7·2 answers
  • Help with this please
    8·1 answer
  • A 10.00 kg mass is attached to a 250N/m spring and set into vertical oscillation. When the mass is 0.50m above the equilibrium i
    15·1 answer
  • An object is moving in the absence of a net force. Which of the following best describes the object’s motion? A. The object will
    15·1 answer
  • Material through which a wave passes
    11·1 answer
  • Most of the Earth's surface is covered by what?
    12·2 answers
  • True or False: We have a limited amount of fossil fuels.<br> True.<br> False.
    7·1 answer
  • Un vehiculo se desplaza con movimiento rectilio uniforme. Sabiendo que recorre 90 km en 3 horas. Averiguo la velocidad en m/s.
    11·1 answer
  • Name an element in the same family as sodium
    14·2 answers
  • if A and B are non zero vectors, is it possible for vector A×vector B and vector A.vector B both to be zero? Justify your answer
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!