Answer:
V2 = 35.967cm^3
Explanation:
Given data:
P1 = 0.2atm
P2 = 1.4atm
V1 = 250cm^3
V2 = ?
T1 = 10°C + 273 = 283K
T2 = 12°C + 273 = 285K
Apply combined law:
P1xV1/T1 = P2xV2/T2 ...eq1
Substituting values:
0.2 x 250/283 = 1.4 x V2/285
Solve for V2:
V2 = 14250/396.2
V2 = 35.967cm^3
The time the chocolate bar could power the laptop in hours is 0.00233 hrs.
Since 200 Calories of chocolate bar were burned to power the 100 Watt laptop, we need to find the number of joules on energy in 200 calories of chocolate bar.
Knowing that 4.2 Joules = 1 Calorie, then
200 Calories = 200 × 1 calorie = 200 × 4.2 Joules = 840 Joules
Since the power required by the laptop is 100 W = 100 J/s and Power, P = energy/time
so, time = energy/power
So, the time for the laptop to use 840 J of energy from the chocolate bar at a rate or power of 100 W = 100 J/s is
time = 840 J ÷ 100 J/s = 8.4 s
So, the time in hours is 8.4 s ÷ 3600 s/1 h = 0.00233 hrs (since 1 hr = 3600 s)
So, the time the chocolate bar could power the laptop in hours is 0.00233 hrs.
Learn more about time to power here:
brainly.com/question/17732603
Answer:
IO₂
Explanation:
We have been given the mass percentages of the elements that makes up the compound:
Mass percentage given are:
Iodine = 79.86%
Oxygen = 20.14%
To calculate the empirical formula which is the simplest formula of the compound, we follow these steps:
> Express the mass percentages as the mass of the elements of the compound.
> Find the number of moles by dividing through by the atomic masses
> Divide by the smallest and either approximate to nearest whole number or multiply through by a factor.
> The ratio is the empirical formula of the compound.
Solution:
I O
% of elements 79.86 20.14
Mass (in g) 79.86 20.14
Moles(divide by
Atomic mass) 79.86/127 20.14/16
Moles 0.634 1.259
Dividing by
Smallest 0.634/0.634 1.259/0.634
1 2
The empirical formula is IO₂
Answer:
Explanation:
The standard system of measurement is what is popularly referred to as SI unit (or international system of units). For example, the SI unit for length is basically in meters (m), which is convertible to millimeter (mm), centimeter (cm) or even kilometer (km).
If there is no standard system of measurement,
1) Scientists will not be able to compare data as every scientist will use a unit that suits him/herself which might make data incomparable as some units might be difficult to convert to other units or there conversion methods might even be debatable.
2) There might be a general lack of understanding of the research work done by a scientist/scientists in the scientific community. This is because the standard system of measurement affords scientists to communicate properly with the same or convertible units and based on 1. above, if scientists use any unit that isn't agreed upon, different/unknown/debatable units might make understanding of research works incomprehensible.
