Answer:
Orbital motion results when the object’s forward motion is balanced by a second object’s gravitational pull.
Explanation:
The gravitational force is responsible for the orbital motion of the planet, satellite, artificial satellite, and other heavenly bodies in outer space.
When an object is applied with a velocity that is equal to the velocity of the orbit at that location, the body continues to move forward. And, this motion is balanced by the gravitational pull of the second object.
The orbiting body experience a centripetal force that is equal to the gravitational force of the second object towards the body.
The velocity of the orbit is given by the relation,
Where
V - velocity of the orbit at a height h from the surface
R - Radius of the second object
G - Gravitational constant
h - height from the surface
The body will be in orbital motion when its kinetic motion is balanced by gravitational force.
Hence, the orbital motion results when the object’s forward motion is balanced by a second object’s gravitational pull.
Answer:
5080.86m
Explanation:
We will divide the problem in parts 1 and 2, and write the equation of accelerated motion with those numbers, taking the upwards direction as positive. For the first part, we have:
We must consider that it's launched from the ground (
) and from rest (
), with an upwards acceleration 
that lasts a time t=9.7s.
We calculate then the height achieved in part 1:
And the velocity achieved in part 1:
We do the same for part 2, but now we must consider that the initial height is the one achieved in part 1 (
) and its initial velocity is the one achieved in part 1 (
), now in free fall, which means with a downwards acceleration 
. For the data we have it's faster to use the formula 
, where d will be the displacement, or difference between maximum height and starting height of part 2, and the final velocity at maximum height we know must be 0m/s, so we have:
Then, to get 
, we do:
And we substitute the values:
Answer:
melting polar icecaps seems the best, hopes this helps!
Answer:
The difference between the two is, well for one
Spectrum: The entire range that the "waves" could be such, as visible light, x-ray's and so on.
Waves: These are different because they aren't telling you or showing the entire spectrum just which they length that they are.
It may confuse you but it makes sense to me (Sorry)
Explanation:
