Answer:
Chemical Engineer,Geological Engineer,Aerospace Engineer
Explanation:
Answer:
It creates airflow in the engine
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
In electrical terms, is the ratio of time in which a load or circuit is ON compared to the time in which the load or circuit is OFF.
The duty cycle or power cycle, is expressed as a percentage of the activation time. For example, a 70% duty cycle is a signal that 70% of the time is activated and the other 30% disabled. Its equation can be expressed as:
Where:
Here is a picture that will help you understand these concepts.
Answer:
Distillation, heat
Explanation:
Here in this question, we simply want to look at the best options that could fit in the gaps.
We have a mixture of liquids having boiling points which is far from each other.
Whenever we have a mixture of liquids with boiling points far away from each other, the best technique to use in separating them is to use distillation. That is why we have that as the best fit for the first missing gap.
Now, to get the liquids to separate from each other, we shall be needing the heating mantle for the application of heat. This ensures that the mixture is vaporized. After vaporization, the condensing tube will help to condense the vapor of each of the liquids once we reach the boiling point of either of the two.
Kindly note that the liquid with the lower temperature will evaporate first and will be first obtained. In fact after reaching a little above the boiling point of the lower boiling liquid, we can be sure that what we have left in the mixture pot is the second other liquid with the higher boiling point.
Answer:
a) The key issues are the sue for libel and the evidence.
b) I would make a deal with her and implement a security program in the company.
Explanation:
The main issue in this case is that Pam Jones sued the company for libel, and the company remains in a position in which it has to prove that the internal investigation followed the right steps and indeed, the proves reflected that she was guilty and the fact that she got fired was correct.
The important here is exactly that the theft can be proved.
As an HR Director, I would give the correct proves in order to win the case, and if that is impossible, because of the tools and evidence, I would make a deal with her where both parts can be adequate to the problem.
She can´t be working again in the company but she can get financed according to her working years; also I would use this case as a growing opportunity by implementing new security methods that give more confidence between the company and its employees.
