Decreases, stays the same, increases.
The volume decreases because as air is cooled, the individual molecules collectively possess less kinetic energy and the distances between them decrease, thus leading to a decrease in the volume they occupy at a certain pressure (please note that my answer only holds under constant pressure; air, as a gas, doesn't actually have a definite volume).
The mass stays the same because physical processes do not create or destroy matter. The law of conservation of mass is obeyed. You're only cooling the air, not adding more air molecules.
The density decreases because as the volume decreases and mass stays the same, you have the same mass occupying a smaller volume. Density is mass divided by volume, so as mass is held constant and volume decreases, density increases.
Answer:
Hello, I believe it would have a negative charge considering protons have a positive charge while elctrons have a negative charge
Explanation:
Answer: True
A water pump
belong to a positive displacement pump that provides constant flow of water at
fixed speed, regardless of changes in the counter pressure. The two main types
of positive displacement pump are rotary pumps and reciprocating pumps.
Moreover, water
pump is a reciprocating positive displacement pump that have an expanding
cavity on the suction side and a decreasing cavity on the discharge side. In
water pumps, the liquid flows into the pumps as the cavity on the suction side
expands and then the liquid flows out of the discharge as the cavity collapses
providing water in a pail.
First choice: the inability of current technology to capture
large amounts of the
Sun's energy
Well, it's true that large amounts of it get away ... our 'efficiency' at capturing it is still rather low. But the amount of free energy we're able to capture is still huge and significant, so this isn't really a major problem.
Second choice: the inability of current technology to store
captured solar
energy
No. We're pretty good at building batteries to store small amounts, or raising water to store large amounts. Storage could be better and cheaper than it is, but we can store huge amounts of captured solar energy right now, so this isn't a major problem either.
Third choice: inconsistencies in the availability of the resource
I think this is it. If we come to depend on solar energy, then we're
expectedly out of luck at night, and we may unexpectedly be out
of luck during long periods of overcast skies.
Fourth choice: lack of
demand for solar energy
If there is a lack of demand, it's purely a result of willful manipulation
of the market by those whose interests are hurt by solar energy.
NO musical instrument produces a 'pure' tone with only a
single frequency in it.
EVERY instrument produces more or less harmonics (multiples)
in addition to the basic frequency it's playing.
The percussion instruments (drums etc) are the richest producers
of bunches of different frequencies.
Fuzzy electric guitars are next richest.
The strings and brass instruments are moderate producers of
harmonics ... I can't remember which is greater than the other.
Then come the woodwinds ... clarinet, oboe, etc.
The closest to 'pure' tones of single frequency are the sounds
made by the flute and piccolo, but even these are far from 'pure'.
The only way to get a true single-frequency sound is from an
electronic 'sine wave' generator.
