Answer:
E = 3.8 kJ
Explanation:
Given that,
The mass of the object, m = 10 g = 0.01 kg
The heat of fusion of aluminum is 380 kJ/kg
We need to find the energy required to melt the mass of the aluminium. It can be calculated as follows:
E = mL
So,
E = 0.01 × 380
E = 3.8 kJ
So, the energy required to melt the mass is equal 3.8 kJ.
data which is expressed in form of following way

here in above expression
= true value
= uncertainty in the value
now the relative uncertainty is given as

now by above formula we can say
a) 2.70 ± 0.05cm
here
True value = 2.70
uncertainty = 0.05
Relative uncertainty =
= 0.0185
b) 12.02 ± 0.08cm
here
True value = 12.02
uncertainty = 0.08
Relative uncertainty =
= 0.00665
Answer:
The box will be moving at 0.45m/s. The solution to this problem requires the knowledge and application of newtons second law of motion and the knowledge of linear motion. The vertical component of the force Fp acts vertically upwards against the directio of motion. This causes a constant upward force of 23sin45° to act on the box. Fhe frictional force of 13N also acts vertically upwards and so two forces act upwards against rhe force of gravity resulting un a net force of 0.7N acting kn the box. This corresponds to an acceleration of 0.225m/s². So in w.0s after i start to push v = 0.45m/s.
Explanation:
Answer:
The time taken to stop the box equals 1.33 seconds.
Explanation:
Since frictional force always acts opposite to the motion of the box we can find the acceleration that the force produces using newton's second law of motion as shown below:

Given mass of box = 5.0 kg
Frictional force = 30 N
thus

Now to find the time that the box requires to stop can be calculated by first equation of kinematics
The box will stop when it's final velocity becomes zero

Here acceleration is taken as negative since it opposes the motion of the box since frictional force always opposes motion.
The statement about pointwise convergence follows because C is a complete metric space. If fn → f uniformly on S, then |fn(z) − fm(z)| ≤ |fn(z) − f(z)| + |f(z) − fm(z)|, hence {fn} is uniformly Cauchy. Conversely, if {fn} is uniformly Cauchy, it is pointwise Cauchy and therefore converges pointwise to a limit function f. If |fn(z)−fm(z)| ≤ ε for all n,m ≥ N and all z ∈ S, let m → ∞ to show that |fn(z)−f(z)|≤εforn≥N andallz∈S. Thusfn →f uniformlyonS.
2. This is immediate from (2.2.7).
3. We have f′(x) = (2/x3)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, and f′(0) = limh→0(1/h)e−1/h2 = 0. Since f(n)(x) is of the form pn(1/x)e−1/x2 for x ̸= 0, where pn is a polynomial, an induction argument shows that f(n)(0) = 0 for all n. If g is analytic on D(0,r) and g = f on (−r,r), then by (2.2.16), g(z) =